.MTM5Ng.MTIwNzQ1

From Newberry Transcribe
Revision as of 20:24, 14 October 2021 by Jakemoore925 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In only one passage are the two artists considered together, and an admirer a priori like sigma Chiovenda could hardly fail to find it "eigen- artig."This occurs in a letter to Guido Sette (tam , V, 17) which Wilkins dates around '42-'43, in which case Simone, who died in 1344, would have been still living, contrary to the impression to be gained from an unwary reading of the document, How- ever this may be, the passage, although abruptly introduced, appears less extravagant when re- lated to the general theme, than a letter to Sitle


removed the author. But seemingly irrevocably lost,

probably the earnings and goings of admirers! only the (reproach?) comparison which covers AFTER the passage, of having written a "pulera" little though being himself an "ignoble" man; (since