.MTM5Ng.MTIwNzQ4: Difference between revisions
KyroBrandon (talk | contribs) (Created page with "To an accustomed....... this may seem the unclear admire the "spaciousness" of Jiotto and to place in polar contrast with this the sublime/graphic in and linearity of th...") |
CastleCourt (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
To | To us accustomed....... this may seem the [criticism of the dilettante | ||
to admire the "spaciousness" of Giotto and to place in | |||
admire the "spaciousness" of | polar contrast with this the sublime/graphism and | ||
polar contrast with this the sublime/ | linearity of the Sienese, manifestly so congenial to the visualizing | ||
linearity of the | of Petrarch. But one would risk the anacronistic | ||
of Petrarch. But one would risk the | retro-dating on an idée chic [[not crossed out, but with words written above: in the manner]] from the vocabulary of | ||
a modern schoolboy: Giotto and his school Giottesques, Pietro | |||
a modern schoolboy: | Lorenzetti and Simone cohabit without quarreling | ||
the [[overwritten: supreme]] matchless walls of Assisi where a brilliant | |||
hypothesis of Roberto Longhi [[overwritten: postulates ]] discovers Cima | |||
but as the teacher common to both Giotto and | |||
Duccio. We may easily concede that a [[overwritten: space]] definition | |||
[[ | [[overwritten: reduction of mental]] focally smaller intellectual armamentarium did not allow | ||
the poet other | the poet other tertium comparationis than the | ||
common ground of painting as | common ground of painting as requiring only | ||
the vital breath to integrate the perfect imitation | the vital breath to integrate the perfect imitation; | ||
a common ground equally adapted to an entirely | a common ground equally adapted to | ||
romantic bust of | an entirely heterogenious work such as the | ||
(then in the | romantic bust of sant'Ambrogio in plaster | ||
(then in the basilica and now in the museum) | |||
of which in August, 1353, he wrote from | of which in August, 1353, he wrote from | ||
Milano to one of the Florentine friends who deplored | |||
his acquiescence to the invitation of a "tyrant | his acquiescence to the invitation of a "tyrant" |
Latest revision as of 02:07, 11 January 2022
To us accustomed....... this may seem the [criticism of the dilettante to admire the "spaciousness" of Giotto and to place in polar contrast with this the sublime/graphism and linearity of the Sienese, manifestly so congenial to the visualizing of Petrarch. But one would risk the anacronistic retro-dating on an idée chic not crossed out, but with words written above: in the manner from the vocabulary of a modern schoolboy: Giotto and his school Giottesques, Pietro Lorenzetti and Simone cohabit without quarreling the overwritten: supreme matchless walls of Assisi where a brilliant hypothesis of Roberto Longhi overwritten: postulates discovers Cima but as the teacher common to both Giotto and Duccio. We may easily concede that a overwritten: space definition overwritten: reduction of mental focally smaller intellectual armamentarium did not allow the poet other tertium comparationis than the common ground of painting as requiring only the vital breath to integrate the perfect imitation; a common ground equally adapted to an entirely heterogenious work such as the romantic bust of sant'Ambrogio in plaster (then in the basilica and now in the museum) of which in August, 1353, he wrote from Milano to one of the Florentine friends who deplored his acquiescence to the invitation of a "tyrant"