.NjY.MjYzMTA

From Newberry Transcribe
Revision as of 16:44, 8 September 2017 by 207.38.94.30 (talk) (Created page with "Instead of economic liberation the "big boys" are fighting for economic rehabilitation. Sounds good, don't it? She do, but there is sand in the oys-ter. How can they rehabilit...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Instead of economic liberation the "big boys" are fighting for economic rehabilitation. Sounds good, don't it? She do, but there is sand in the oys-ter. How can they rehabilitate something we never had, an economic break? And thereby hangs a tale. Devaluation of the gold content of dollar functions, in the reverse, actions of in-creased taxation. Merits' of relative po-sitions are beyond me and I fear the nation will Pull an "effie fay' [three dots under fay] or "gertly hoffman"

[Reenrrence?] and reversions to or back outside the merits of the case, as: [Reenrrte?] what? Revert to what? What we want is improvement on that what was and on that what is- and to get that we are willing to [reeurr?], revert or stand on our head. Rehabilitation will not fetch the bacon. It may give us what was, but what was it? It is the choosing of a lesser evil than you have. Why dwell in the realm of evils? Why demand evil only less onerous? It's like hollering for smaller cracks in your walls. I suppose you want ventilation? Nail a board over 'em! [three dots under "'em"] [crossed out from "rewrite what?" to "over 'em"]