.Nw.ODI1

[...]1.16. [...] have not [...] but might as well have studied [..] old Arrian senses of making [marking?] God's [...] bu be [...] as may be said [...] erra[..] if [..] first [...] infinite [...] if one creature may create another it [...] [..] God by nature. Other arguments for [...] Divinity of X see si Xlo f 1. c 4. occ:[?] [...] main difficultiy in explaining the d[...]sine [..] Trinity by reason may be [...] [...] can be [...]but one God Now they can agree in a [ ] or not agree among themselves. [ ] say one individual nature may be communicated to [ ] unless we suppose [ ] divine nature cannot communicate after no other [ ] a