.MTI4NA.MTAzMjAy

"ancients had not said all our good things before as would he not be more likely to unite a unclear or a unclear, perhaps still more unclear, rather than a Paradise unclear? To think of it but you think of writing a book yourself. If so- I take back all I have written- If you feel that you can really write a book which will make the world wiser or better, or yourself richer & better, my advice is positive- do it. Better be pretty sure of it unclear though. That projected unclear. The envious unclear destroyed it. The one word unnecessary to the sense of the whole story. What was it? The battles- unclear? No. Of life? There is unclear a title already of Dickens. Of the world? That is it. You say familiar to those books of unclear. Don't you write it however without you can write a far better book than those unclear concerns- That is without you have the appearance. Of some such introduction as shall make it profitable as those have been. It is however a much better unclear than they - more difficult though - and less likely, even if well written to "take." That "what might have been" is a great field. Without one single new idea or fact, ten times the amount even written could be unclear in that way. Yes- a new three volume novel on every page of history or fiction ever written? The best example of that I ever saw was a "continuation"