.MTAzNA.NjkzMTg

from 118 1/2 Brls is about as great a saving as can be expected from a small bakery using not much more than 1/2 Brl per day. I do not think there is any loss? in the Flour. I would however call attention to one point which seems to have escaped the attention of the Post? Comdr? and the Post? Council. 33 1/6 Brls of Flour brought but $229.59 hence the flour unclear have been sold at $6 88/100 pr. barrel. The average price of flour has been for those months $9 95/100 per barrel, a loss of $101 82/100 has been sustained in the value of the savings. This loss added to the amount collected $22.59 would have made the proper savings about $330.41 approximating to the amount ($400/) the Post Commander estimated should have been realized. It is probable that the leakage exists in the low price at which the Council has fixed the price of Bread Viz. 5[cents sign] per ration loaf of 21 ounces. (Sgd S Flushing Capt GGS?

Respectfully returned to Comdy? Officer San Antonio, Tx The Dept Comdr. sees no reason for any misunderstanding about such a matter as this. The Proceedings of the Council as recorded are certainly not very clear and afford no data for deciding whether proper savings have been made or not. The endorsement of the Chf. Com. of unclear may throw some light on the subject. Two things are very certain, 1st. Savings of Bakehouse never exceed in practice thirty percent - hardly can come up to it. 2d 21 ounces of bread cannot be sold for five cents with proper gain for Post Fund. If Capt. Prince? desires the Council to make actual experiment at the bake house which I think would be well let, him order them specially.

DT May 10/73 By Command of Gen'l? August? (Sgd) C M Keever? A A General

Griffin Fl? Endorsement of Charges and Specifications preferred against C. O. Lt. J. Whitnery? unclear (LR 2226 DT unclear)