.MTA2NA.NzIyNTE

The irregularities and improprieties charged against the [unclear] appear to be of three kinds. [unclear] Prejudice against that portion of the Cherokee claimants, who opposed the Treaty, and apartiality for those [unclear] it; [unclear] led to the rejection of many [house or homes?] claims of the first and to the admifrion of many unfounded of the latter. 2d. That there were persons who had claims of the most unfounded character against the Indians, (particularly those hostile to the treaty) admitted to a large amount, while honest claimants had theirs rejected. 3d. That there were some persons, who, in an underhand manner, could get claims of any description [unclear], even if they had once been rejected by the [Commifrioners ?] , when others almost uniformly failed, and that the former realized enormous amounts. There charges cenridered simply with reference to the claims imply this distinction - good claims rejected and bad claims admitted. Whether this were the case can be ascertained only be an examination of all the original papers, and by a careful comparison of those admitted with those rejected. Should such an examination disclose the fact that a considerable number of claims were admitted of a much [leJs?] meritorions character than many of those rejected, the truth of the charges would be pretty clearly established. This examination would, however, require