.MTAzMw.NjkxMzU

49 [page stamp]

Respectfully returned to the A. A. A. General, Dep't. of Texas.

         The enclosed Charges of violation of the 6th and 83rd. Articles of War are sustainable under the allegations of their respective specifications.
          The Conduct alleged in the specification to 1st charge, is a refusal to accept a civility from his Commanding Officer during an official interview.  The Specification does not, in the opinion of this Office, sustain the charge of "disrespect" or "contempt".  At most, [2 word underline] the neglect or refusal to sit down, as stated in the specification to the 2nd. charge, is a simple disobedience and is not properly chargeable as a violation of the 83rd. Article of War (see Digest Opinion J.A. G. page 3584).   The statements of the specifications to 3rd Charge are, that neglect or refusal by a subordinate to accept a courtesy from his Commanding Officer, while transacting official business, is prejudicial to good order and military discipline.  If the acts stated were accomplished by no aggravation, it seemed a strained construction of the Article, to hold that they constitute a violation of its provisions.  Paragraph 254. R. A. R. 1863, requires courtesy between Officers at all times, and Lieut. Parker may have failed to exhibit due deference for the request of Lieut. Col. Buell, but the offence does not, in the opinion of this Office, assume the gravity, which requires the trial of accused, by General Court Martial.
                                                                                                       (Sgd) H. B. Burnham
                                                                                                                 Major and Judge Advocate"