.MTA2NA.NzIzMzU

From Newberry Transcribe
Revision as of 15:24, 19 July 2020 by imported>Kitsapian (Created page with "late decision of the Supreme Court in the missionary case is erroneous, and, therefore, that id does not come within the constitutional duty of the President "to take care tha...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

late decision of the Supreme Court in the missionary case is erroneous, and, therefore, that id does not come within the constitutional duty of the President "to take care that the law is faithfully executed," he has already said that this is an inquiry upon which the President, from the strictly Executive character of his power, has no constitutional right to enter; the Constitution having never intended to erect him into an appellate judicial tribunal to revise & reverse the decisions of the Supreme Court. But waving this objection, and regarding the paper in the light of an appeal to the people of the United States from the decision of the Supreme Court, let us see whether this Executive battery has shaken, in the slightest degree, any part of the Court's opinion.