.MTk5.NDUxNDg: Difference between revisions
imported>Qwyzm (Created page with "...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[IMAGE F..O. STANLEY NEWTON MASS.]] | |||
him from doing the things he should do, or restrain him from doing what he should not do. Now prohibition comes under this latter class of laws and is a strictly | 3. 3. | ||
him from doing the things he should do, or restrain him from doing what he should not do. Now prohibition comes under this latter class of laws and is a strictly sumptuary law. | |||
It may be argued that this is a purely academic objection. But I am confident it is not. On the other hand a disregard of the legitimate sphere of government is the source of most of the unwise legislation that is leading to too much government, excessive taxation, and a growing disrespect for law. And this I regard as America's greatest danger today. | It may be argued that this is a purely academic objection. But I am confident it is not. On the other hand a disregard of the legitimate sphere of government is the source of most of the unwise legislation that is leading to too much government, excessive taxation, and a growing disrespect for law. And this I regard as America's greatest danger today. | ||
My second objection to the law is it has never been enforced and I question if it ever can be enforced, at least not for many, many years to come. It was not enforced in Maine, it was not enforced in Kansas, or any other state where tried. But it is argued the strong arm of the government will succeed where the states have failed. But what evidence have we for thinking the Federal government will succeed any better than the states have succeeded? Why does not the strong arm of the government enforce the 14th article | My second [[underlined]] objection to the law is it has never been enforced and I question if it ever can be enforced, at least not for many, many years to come. It was not enforced in Maine, it was not enforced in Kansas, or any other state where tried. But it is argued the strong arm of the government will succeed where the states have failed. But what evidence have we for thinking the Federal government will succeed any better than the states have succeeded? Why does not the strong arm of the government enforce the 14th article | ||
over | |||
Latest revision as of 15:33, 19 April 2020
IMAGE F..O. STANLEY NEWTON MASS.
3. 3. him from doing the things he should do, or restrain him from doing what he should not do. Now prohibition comes under this latter class of laws and is a strictly sumptuary law. It may be argued that this is a purely academic objection. But I am confident it is not. On the other hand a disregard of the legitimate sphere of government is the source of most of the unwise legislation that is leading to too much government, excessive taxation, and a growing disrespect for law. And this I regard as America's greatest danger today. My second underlined objection to the law is it has never been enforced and I question if it ever can be enforced, at least not for many, many years to come. It was not enforced in Maine, it was not enforced in Kansas, or any other state where tried. But it is argued the strong arm of the government will succeed where the states have failed. But what evidence have we for thinking the Federal government will succeed any better than the states have succeeded? Why does not the strong arm of the government enforce the 14th article over