.OTg5.NjM3NjU: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I am much gratified to have your sanction, in the main, of the subject matter of my pamphlet. Knowing your views on the subject, and, of Counsel, having my own, I was consider...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am much gratified to have your sanction, in the main, of the subject matter of my pamphlet. Knowing your views on the subject, and, of Counsel, having my own, I was considerably concerned as to whether my efforts were such as would warrant your approval, but your kind letter has assured me on that point, much to my satisfaction. | I am much gratified to have your sanction, in the main, of the subject matter of my pamphlet. Knowing your views on the subject, and, of Counsel, having my own, I was considerably concerned as to whether my efforts were such as would warrant your approval, but your kind letter has assured me on that point, much to my satisfaction. | ||
So no "personalities" I do not know whether you mean that I should have been more sparing of your name or that I should have been less aggressive (seemingly) [[ | So no "personalities" I do not know whether you mean that I should have been more sparing of your name or that I should have been less aggressive (seemingly) [[toward?]] the Commissions, or both, I presume I had better been less direct ni my style of getting at his statements, notwithstanding their absurdities; and in the future ^I will ^have ni mind your words of caution. In those parts where your name | ||
Latest revision as of 04:55, 28 September 2020
I am much gratified to have your sanction, in the main, of the subject matter of my pamphlet. Knowing your views on the subject, and, of Counsel, having my own, I was considerably concerned as to whether my efforts were such as would warrant your approval, but your kind letter has assured me on that point, much to my satisfaction. So no "personalities" I do not know whether you mean that I should have been more sparing of your name or that I should have been less aggressive (seemingly) toward? the Commissions, or both, I presume I had better been less direct ni my style of getting at his statements, notwithstanding their absurdities; and in the future ^I will ^have ni mind your words of caution. In those parts where your name