.Nw.MTEyMQ: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
3. | |||
region about Jerusalem where or. [our] Savr [Savior] suff'red | region about Jerusalem where or. [our] Savr [Savior] suff'red | ||
& that therefore it was not an ecclipse of ye Sun | & that therefore it was not an ecclipse of ye Sun | ||
for wch ye Authorities are not so great as at first | for wch ye Authorities are not so great as at first | ||
they appear to be, And herein I would not be | they appear to be, And herein I would not be | ||
thought to derogate from ye truth or ye wonder | thought to derogate from ye [underscore] truth or ye wonder [/underscore] | ||
of this darkness. The truth is sufficiently attested | of this darkness. The [underscore]truth [/underscore] is sufficiently attested | ||
or born witnes to by other | or born witnes to by other Authours if there were | ||
any need of ym after this most express testimony | any need of ym [them] after this most express testimony | ||
of ye holy | of ye holy Evangelist I read in a very good Au | ||
-thour that Phlegon Trallianus ye Libertus or | -thour that Phlegon Trallianus ye Libertus or | ||
freeman of Augustus (say some) of Adrian say | freeman of Augustus (say some) of Adrian say | ||
| Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
to his works, besides this Heathen wee have ye testi | to his works, besides this Heathen wee have ye testi | ||
-monies of Euselius, Lucian ye Preslyter of Antioch | -monies of Euselius, Lucian ye Preslyter of Antioch | ||
& Tattullian who all appeal to ye | & Tattullian who all appeal to ye Heathens & their | ||
Annually for ye undoubted truth of this matter. | Annually for ye undoubted truth of this matter. | ||
Neither is ye wonder of it less, if ye darknes (as I | Neither is ye wonder of it less, if ye darknes (as I | ||
understand it) was particular to Judea, for who but | understand it) was particular to Judea, for who but | ||
the God | the God | ||
[marginalia: [c]ornelius ver rel ?ial] | |||
Revision as of 00:19, 11 July 2017
3.
region about Jerusalem where or. [our] Savr [Savior] suff'red & that therefore it was not an ecclipse of ye Sun for wch ye Authorities are not so great as at first they appear to be, And herein I would not be thought to derogate from ye [underscore] truth or ye wonder [/underscore] of this darkness. The [underscore]truth [/underscore] is sufficiently attested or born witnes to by other Authours if there were any need of ym [them] after this most express testimony of ye holy Evangelist I read in a very good Au -thour that Phlegon Trallianus ye Libertus or freeman of Augustus (say some) of Adrian say others wm [whom] my Author cals ye most accurate of all chronographers, relates how yt in ye 4th year of ye 210th Olympiad there was such an ecclips of ye Sun as no age ever had seen, & ty it may accom -panied wth a terrible earthquake, now this year being ye 18th of Tiberius wherein X [Christ ]was crucified, he must needs (as he inferrs) speak of yt darkness here men[t]iond. I confes this is not a very pressing argumt & I have not means wth yt small collection of books I have to trans so full an answer to it, as I would but I say yt less weight upon it because 'tis slighted by the learned Mr Gregory of X'church [Christchurch] in ye Preface to his works, besides this Heathen wee have ye testi -monies of Euselius, Lucian ye Preslyter of Antioch & Tattullian who all appeal to ye Heathens & their Annually for ye undoubted truth of this matter. Neither is ye wonder of it less, if ye darknes (as I understand it) was particular to Judea, for who but the God
[marginalia: [c]ornelius ver rel ?ial]