.ODk.MjI4MDk: Difference between revisions
imported>Beth O'D (Created page with "{sideways} unclear unclear unclear if you ever lived us? Moment? Repton?, Shemango? Co N. Y. L. unclear a family of your name there, years...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{sideways} [[unclear]] [[unclear]] [[unclear]] if you [[ever]] lived [[us?]] [[Moment?]] [[Repton?]], [[Shemango?]] Co N. Y. L. [[unclear]] a family of your name there, years ago | {sideways} [[unclear]] [[unclear]] [[unclear]] if you [[ever]] lived [[us?]] [[Moment?]] [[Repton?]], [[Shemango?]] Co N. Y. L. [[unclear]] a family of your name there, years ago | ||
Scipioville Gayaga Co N. J. Sept 18th 1866, | |||
Miss C. [[unclear]] Everett, To madam, Yours of the 15th [[unclear]] is first [[received?]], and, having wrote you in regard to the needlecase, I willingly answer both letters, as it was with the [[induction?]] that I wrote my communication to you, in regard to both letter and needlecase. Perhaps, if you may be a disappointment to you to know that your needlecase fell into the hand of a Chaplain in the Army, [[instead?]] of me in the [[ranks?]], bu, its history in either case is not [[lost?]], though, perhaps more interesting had it [[unclear]] in possession of the latter | Miss C. [[unclear]] Everett, To madam, Yours of the 15th [[unclear]] is first [[received?]], and, having wrote you in regard to the needlecase, I willingly answer both letters, as it was with the [[induction?]] that I wrote my communication to you, in regard to both letter and needlecase. Perhaps, if you may be a disappointment to you to know that your needlecase fell into the hand of a Chaplain in the Army, [[instead?]] of me in the [[ranks?]], bu, its history in either case is not [[lost?]], though, perhaps more interesting had it [[unclear]] in possession of the latter | ||
I suppose it is generally though, that Officers in the Army were able to have, and in fact had, all their [[needs?]] supplied, this supposition, no doubt arose from the fact that their pay was more than that of a private. So far as pay is concerned they did have more per month than those in the [[ranks?]], but, alas for both Officer and private! The contingencies of war [[often?]] fought there [[both]] as a [[lower?]] point of wants and both have had to be companions in [[tribulation?]] frequently, though the one might have had a higher salary than the other. | I suppose it is generally though, that Officers in the Army were able to have, and in fact had, all their [[needs?]] supplied, this supposition, no doubt arose from the fact that their pay was more than that of a private. So far as pay is concerned they did have more per month than those in the [[ranks?]], but, alas for both Officer and private! The contingencies of war [[often?]] fought there [[both]] as a [[lower?]] point of wants and both have had to be companions in [[tribulation?]] frequently, though the one might have had a higher salary than the other. | ||
In consequence of this I have [[seen?]] [[Officers?]], looking much worse in appearance than [[there?]] under [[them?]], and so far as food was concerned those in the ranks would have their [[rations]] while the Officers would have none; simply because the government had not paid the latter, while they were [[unclear]] to [[unclear]] food to the former, this [[however]] was not always the case, as both have [[been]] brought into circumstances when food & clothing was insufficient, because supplies were de- | In consequence of this I have [[seen?]] [[Officers?]], looking much worse in appearance than [[there?]] under [[them?]], and so far as food was concerned those in the ranks would have their [[rations]] while the Officers would have none; simply because the government had not paid the latter, while they were [[unclear]] to [[unclear]] food to the former, this [[however]] was not always the case, as both have [[been]] brought into circumstances when food & clothing was insufficient, because supplies were de- | ||
Revision as of 21:07, 7 April 2020
{sideways} unclear unclear unclear if you ever lived us? Moment? Repton?, Shemango? Co N. Y. L. unclear a family of your name there, years ago Scipioville Gayaga Co N. J. Sept 18th 1866, Miss C. unclear Everett, To madam, Yours of the 15th unclear is first received?, and, having wrote you in regard to the needlecase, I willingly answer both letters, as it was with the induction? that I wrote my communication to you, in regard to both letter and needlecase. Perhaps, if you may be a disappointment to you to know that your needlecase fell into the hand of a Chaplain in the Army, instead? of me in the ranks?, bu, its history in either case is not lost?, though, perhaps more interesting had it unclear in possession of the latter I suppose it is generally though, that Officers in the Army were able to have, and in fact had, all their needs? supplied, this supposition, no doubt arose from the fact that their pay was more than that of a private. So far as pay is concerned they did have more per month than those in the ranks?, but, alas for both Officer and private! The contingencies of war often? fought there both as a lower? point of wants and both have had to be companions in tribulation? frequently, though the one might have had a higher salary than the other. In consequence of this I have seen? Officers?, looking much worse in appearance than there? under them?, and so far as food was concerned those in the ranks would have their rations while the Officers would have none; simply because the government had not paid the latter, while they were unclear to unclear food to the former, this however was not always the case, as both have been brought into circumstances when food & clothing was insufficient, because supplies were de-