.Nw.ODI1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[..] God by nature. Other arguments for [...] Divinity of X see | [..] God by nature. Other arguments for [...] Divinity of X see | ||
si Xlo f 1. c 4. occ:[?] | si Xlo f 1. c 4. occ:[?] | ||
[...] main difficultiy in explaining the d[...]sine [..] | |||
but one God | Trinity by reason may be [...] | ||
[...] can be [...]but one God | |||
Now they can agree in a [ ] or not agree among themselves. | Now they can agree in a [ ] or not agree among themselves. | ||
[ ] say one individual nature may be communicated to [ ] | [ ] say one individual nature may be communicated to [ ] | ||
unless we suppose [ ] divine nature cannot communicate | unless we suppose [ ] divine nature cannot communicate | ||
after no other [ ] a | after no other [ ] a | ||
Revision as of 21:15, 5 July 2017
[...]1.16. [...] have not [...] but might as well have studied [..] old Arrian senses of making [marking?] God's [...] bu be [...] as may be said [...] erra[..] if [..] first [...] infinite [...] if one creature may create another it [...] [..] God by nature. Other arguments for [...] Divinity of X see si Xlo f 1. c 4. occ:[?] [...] main difficultiy in explaining the d[...]sine [..] Trinity by reason may be [...] [...] can be [...]but one God Now they can agree in a [ ] or not agree among themselves. [ ] say one individual nature may be communicated to [ ] unless we suppose [ ] divine nature cannot communicate after no other [ ] a