.Nw.ODI1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "but one God Now they can agree in a [ ] or not agree among themselves. [ ] say one individual nature may be communicated to [ ] unless we suppose [ ] divine nature cannot co...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[...]1.16. [...] have not [...] | |||
but might as well have studied [..] old Arrian senses of making [marking?] | |||
God's [...] bu be [...] as may be said [...] | |||
erra[..] if [..] first [...] | |||
infinite [...] if one creature may create another it [...] | |||
[..] God by nature. Other arguments for [...] Divinity of X see | |||
si Xlo f 1. c 4. occ:[?] | |||
but one God | but one God | ||
Now they can agree in a [ ] or not agree among themselves. | Now they can agree in a [ ] or not agree among themselves. | ||
Revision as of 21:12, 5 July 2017
[...]1.16. [...] have not [...] but might as well have studied [..] old Arrian senses of making [marking?] God's [...] bu be [...] as may be said [...] erra[..] if [..] first [...] infinite [...] if one creature may create another it [...] [..] God by nature. Other arguments for [...] Divinity of X see si Xlo f 1. c 4. occ:[?]
but one God Now they can agree in a [ ] or not agree among themselves. [ ] say one individual nature may be communicated to [ ] unless we suppose [ ] divine nature cannot communicate after no other [ ] a