.Nw.ODMw: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "But still owns it & justifies himself, such certainly he would never have done if he had known himself to be a mere man, else he would be charged as one who being a mere man a...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
But still owns it & justifies himself, | But still owns it & justifies himself, wch certainly he wd never | ||
have done if he had known himself to be a mere man, else he | have done if he had known himself to be a mere man, else he | ||
must be charged as one who being a mere man affected divine hands | |||
contrary to | contrary to yt humility wch was so nual [natural] to him and Phi 2.6.7 | ||
No | No one can be called God overall blessed forevermore as X is called | ||
Rom 9.5. but | Rom 9.5. but he yt is God by nature & not only by office | ||
The Socinian sense of | The Socinian sense of Jn 1.1.2.8-9 &c. is unna[tur]al for it obscure & | ||
jejune, but ye other sense is strong weighty consistt. & of great conse | |||
-quence | -quence ag[ai]st Corinthus who denyed ye divinity of X. Corinthus did | ||
tech 1 yt there was an unknown father [Greek]. 2 yt ye world | |||
was made by ye Den?urgus betwn am & ye father ye [greek] | |||
emanation. 3. yt this ☉ [Symbol: sun] was in a state of Darknes as to ye [greek] | |||
only some few had some beams of light from him by wch they knew him | |||
4 yt Jesus was a mere man but of great goodnes wisdom & sanctity | |||
5 yt ye [Greek: ῶροαςχήν?] at ye baptism of Jesus dis dend down a divine | |||
power upon him wch returning to ye [greek] & wn he was crucified | |||
Nothing contributes more to ye understanding [of] St Jn then this Scheme | |||
of the Corinthian herecie delivered by ye ancient Fathers | |||
To Hebr: 1.8.9 wee say yt X was Anointed or a mediator & in yt ry pt. | |||
God was his God but this proves not yt he had no divine nature in | |||
conjunction wth ye humane, | |||
Revision as of 00:55, 21 July 2017
But still owns it & justifies himself, wch certainly he wd never have done if he had known himself to be a mere man, else he must be charged as one who being a mere man affected divine hands contrary to yt humility wch was so nual [natural] to him and Phi 2.6.7 No one can be called God overall blessed forevermore as X is called Rom 9.5. but he yt is God by nature & not only by office The Socinian sense of Jn 1.1.2.8-9 &c. is unna[tur]al for it obscure & jejune, but ye other sense is strong weighty consistt. & of great conse -quence ag[ai]st Corinthus who denyed ye divinity of X. Corinthus did tech 1 yt there was an unknown father [Greek]. 2 yt ye world was made by ye Den?urgus betwn am & ye father ye [greek] emanation. 3. yt this ☉ [Symbol: sun] was in a state of Darknes as to ye [greek] only some few had some beams of light from him by wch they knew him 4 yt Jesus was a mere man but of great goodnes wisdom & sanctity 5 yt ye [Greek: ῶροαςχήν?] at ye baptism of Jesus dis dend down a divine power upon him wch returning to ye [greek] & wn he was crucified Nothing contributes more to ye understanding [of] St Jn then this Scheme of the Corinthian herecie delivered by ye ancient Fathers To Hebr: 1.8.9 wee say yt X was Anointed or a mediator & in yt ry pt. God was his God but this proves not yt he had no divine nature in conjunction wth ye humane,