.Nw.ODIz: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "[ed: some of the text is hidden in the binding, thus is unreadable] [pg] 90 De Trinitate contra Socinid [?] came into ye world to teach men to know Religion as ?oon to y fals...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[ed: some of the text is hidden in the binding, thus is unreadable]
[ed: some of the text is hidden in the binding, thus is unreadable]
[pg] 90
[pg] 90


De Trinitate contra Socinid
 
[?] came into ye world to teach men to know Religion as
De Trinitate contra Socinu[s].
?oon to y false ones wch then prevail'd therefore this religion
 
[Our] Savi[o]r came into ye world to teach men to know Religion as
[illeg.] ?oon to ye false ones wch then prevail'd therefore this religion
teach ye worship of ye true God, but this religion teaches ye
teach ye worship of ye true God, but this religion teaches ye
[?p] of Christ go: he is a true God, for ye proof of ye minor
[worship] of Christ go: he is a true God, for ye proof of ye minor
5.23 Hebr: 1.6. Reve: 4.13 Phil: 2.9. obj, may not God  
5.23 Hebr: 1.6. Reve: 4.13 Phil: 2.9. obj, may not God  
make this worship to Christ tho a creature, A/ no. 1 because
make this worship to Christ tho a creature, A/ no. 1 because
[?ch] said he will not give his glory to another Isa: 42.8.
[?ch] said he will not give his glory to another Isa: 42.8.
against ye nature of divine worship to be giv'n to a creature
against ye nature of divine worship to be giv'n to a creature
?initely above any of his creatures, whilst therefore we suppose
[inf]initely above any of his creatures, whilst therefore we suppose
minds a creature to be  infinitely distant from God how is it
minds a creature to be  infinitely distant from God how is it
?s to give ye same worship to God & to a creature, so then if
?s to give ye same worship to God & to a creature, so then if
worship be required by ye Xtian doctrine to be given to X
worship be required by ye Xtian doctrine to be given to X
those expressions ye speak of his being one wth ye father are
those expressions yt speak of his being one wth ye father are
to be understood figuratively.
to be understood figuratively.


Under ye socinians lessen ye natural knowledge & power of  
Under ye Socinians lessen ye natural knowledge & power of  
his other infinite perfections ye be making ye notion of a God
his other infinite perfec[ti]ons ye be making ye notion of a God
as possible a creature might be in a nearer capacity of be-
as possible a creature might be in a nearer capacity of be-
?ide God. 'Tis more difficult in point of reason to conceive
?ide God. 'Tis more difficult in point of reason to conceive
man may be made God then to believe God may be made
man may be made God then to believe God may be made
[man] here te only difficulty is to concieve how an infinite being may
[man] here ye only difficulty is to concieve how an infinite being may
united to a finite as to make one person, & no wonder if we
united to a finite as to make one person, & no wonder if we
?aled in ye manner of yt seing we find it difficult to fxplain
?aled in ye man[n]er of yt seing wee find it difficult to explain
? soul is united to ye body. But ye other may overthrow the
? soul is united to ye body. But ye other may overthrow the
? ye other
? ye other
?re not those wds Jn 10 from 30 to 39 to be understoof figuratively?
?re not those wds Jn 10 from[ ]30 to 39 to be understood figur[ative]ly?
? Jews certainly understood [?] in a literal sense & therrefor ac-
? Jews certainly understood ym [them] in a literal sense & therrefor ac-
?d yn blasphemy. But upon all those discourses betwn X & ye jews
?d ym blasphemy. But upon all those discourses betwn X & ye jews
?d Jn 5. Jn 8 & Jn 10.  this is observable ye ?? lived knew
?d Jn 5. Jn 8 & Jn 10.  this is observable yt tho O[u]r savio[r] knew
? did account it blasphemy in him to pretend to be equal to or
? did account it blasphemy in him to pretend to be equal to or
? God, yet he never setts himself to correct this as a mistake in yn.
? God, yet he never setts himself to correct this as a mistake in ym.

Revision as of 01:51, 20 July 2017

[ed: some of the text is hidden in the binding, thus is unreadable]

[pg] 90


De Trinitate contra Socinu[s].

[Our] Savi[o]r came into ye world to teach men to know Religion as [illeg.] ?oon to ye false ones wch then prevail'd therefore this religion teach ye worship of ye true God, but this religion teaches ye [worship] of Christ go: he is a true God, for ye proof of ye minor 5.23 Hebr: 1.6. Reve: 4.13 Phil: 2.9. obj, may not God make this worship to Christ tho a creature, A/ no. 1 because [?ch] said he will not give his glory to another Isa: 42.8. against ye nature of divine worship to be giv'n to a creature [inf]initely above any of his creatures, whilst therefore we suppose minds a creature to be infinitely distant from God how is it ?s to give ye same worship to God & to a creature, so then if worship be required by ye Xtian doctrine to be given to X those expressions yt speak of his being one wth ye father are to be understood figuratively.

Under ye Socinians lessen ye natural knowledge & power of his other infinite perfec[ti]ons ye be making ye notion of a God as possible a creature might be in a nearer capacity of be- ?ide God. 'Tis more difficult in point of reason to conceive man may be made God then to believe God may be made [man] here ye only difficulty is to concieve how an infinite being may united to a finite as to make one person, & no wonder if we ?aled in ye man[n]er of yt seing wee find it difficult to explain ? soul is united to ye body. But ye other may overthrow the ? ye other ?re not those wds Jn 10 from[ ]30 to 39 to be understood figur[ative]ly? ? Jews certainly understood ym [them] in a literal sense & therrefor ac- ?d ym blasphemy. But upon all those discourses betwn X & ye jews ?d Jn 5. Jn 8 & Jn 10. this is observable yt tho O[u]r savio[r] knew ? did account it blasphemy in him to pretend to be equal to or ? God, yet he never setts himself to correct this as a mistake in ym.