.NDI.MjIzNDk

As for a Judgment of the Elders in [underlined: New England] so farr as I can learn they do generally concurr with Mr [underlined: Perkins] & Mr [underlined: Bernard]. This I know, that at a meeting of Ministers at Cambridge, August 1.1692 where were present Seven elders besides the President of the Colledge, this Question there discours'd on was, whither the Devils may not Sometimes have a permission to represent an innocent person as tormenting such as are under Diabolicall molestations. The answer so they all concurred in was in these words, vis. [underlined: That {illegible} Devils may sometimes have a permission to represent an Innocent person as tormenting such as are under Diabolicall molestations, but that such things are rare & extraordinary, especially when such matters come before civil judicature]. And that some of the most Eminent ministers in the Land [illegible] were not at that meeting are of [illegible] same judgment I am assured. And I am also sure that in cases of this nature, the [illegible] keep knowledge, & they should seek the Law at his mouth. Mat. 2.7.

[Margin note: ** About two years ago, a bewitched person in {underlined: Chelmsford} complained {illegible} relation of hers (a worthy good man) & another person of known piety appeared to her and afflicted her.

Argue. 6. Our own experience hath confirmed [illegible] of [illegible] we affirm. I have in another book given an account concerning [underlined: Eliz. Snap] of [underlined: Groton] who complained that a woman as Eminent for piety as any that town did appear to her & afflict her. but afterwards she was satisfied that that person never did her any harm but that the Devil abused them both.