.NDI.MjIzNDc: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "27 She declares he doth therefore mention it, that so Judges might be cautreous[?] in their proceedings in cases of this nature in as much as the Devil doth often in that way...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:


She declares he doth therefore mention it, that so Judges
She declares he doth therefore mention it, that so Judges
might be cautreous[?] in their proceedings in cases of this nature
might be cautelous in their proceedings in cases of this nature
in as much as the Devil doth often in that way inteangle innocent
in as much as the Devil doth often in that way intangle innocent
persons & bring them into great troubles. His words are (t) [underlined:] have
persons & bring them into great troubles. His words are (t) [underlined: have
historian ideo recito ut Judicus in Imjnsmodi casibus canti Sint
historian ideo recito ut Judicus in Imjnsmodi casibus canti Sint
Diabolus enim hac via Saepe immientibus intidiatur. [end, yikes]. He
Diabolus enim hac via Saepe immientibus intidiatur.]. He
confirms to he saith by Reciting a papage out of Albertus Gran-
confirms w^t he saith by Reciting a passage out of [underlined: Albertus Gran-
zius who writes that the Devil was seen in the shape of a
zius] who writes that the Devil was seen in the shape of a
nobel man to come out of the Empress her chamber. But to clear
noble man to come out of the Empress her chamber. But to clear
her Innocency, she (according to the Superstitious Ordeals then in
her Innocency, she (according to the Superstitious [underlined: Ordeals] then in
fashion) walked blindfold over a great many glowing hot Irons
fashion) walked blindfold over a great many glowing hot Irons
without touching any of them. (u) Voshius[?] in his disputation of
without touching any of them. (u) (mr [underlined: Roetius] in his disputation of
Spectres proposath that question whither the Devil may not
[underlined: Spectres] proposath that question whither the Devil may not
untruly impersonate a godly man & answers in the Affirmative.
untruly personate a godly man & answers in the Affirmative.
And with all adds that it is a Sufficient argument (ad hominem)
And withall adds that it is a Sufficient argument (ad hominem)
to Answer the Papists with their own histories, w^n[?] give instances
to Answer the Papists with their own histories, w^ch give instances
of Satans appearing in the figure of Saints, nay of Christ himself
of Satans appearing in the figure of Saints, nay of Christ himself
& in his discourse concerning the Operations of Daemons (w) he
& in his discourse concerning the [underlined: Operations of Daemons] (w) he
hath the like problem whither ye Devil may not possibly put on
hath the like problem whither ye Devil may not possibly put on
the shape of a true Believer, a Real Saint, not only of Such as
the shape of a true Believer, a Real Saint, not only of Such as
are dead, but still living; & Ansers, Quisni? why not. It is bee
are dead, but still living; & Answers, [underlined: Quidni?] why not. It is bee
[??] Popish Casuists (x) do generally indi[?] to the Negative in the
true Popish [underlined: Casuists] (x) do generally incline to the Negative in the
Question. Nevertheless the instance of Germanus w^o saw a compa
Question. Nevertheless the instance of [underlined: Germanus] w^o saw a compa
-ny of honest people Represented by the Devils as if they had ben
-ny of honest people Represented by the Devils as if they had ben
feasting together when they were Really asleep in their beds, doth
feasting together when they were Really asleep in their beds, doth
a little puzzle them so as they are necessitated to take up with
a little puzzle them so as they are necessitated to take up with
this conclusion (y) [underlined:] that by an extraordinary permission of God
this conclusion (y) [underlined: that by an extraordinary permission of God
Innocent persons may be Represented by Satan in the Nocturnal
Innocent persons may be Represented by Satan in the Nocturnal
Conventicles of witches. [end] And if so, much more as afflicting
Conventicles of witches.] And if so, much more as afflicting
bewitched persons. Delrio gives an Account of an Innocent
bewitched persons. [underlined: Delrio] gives an Account of an Innocent
Monk whose Reputation was endangered by a Demons appearing
Monk whose Reputation was endangered by a Demons appearing
in his shape. He writes more like a Divine than Jesuites w[?] to do
in his shape. He writes more like a Divine than Jesuites use to do
when he saith (z) [underlined:] it is not absolutely to be denied bu that ye Devils
when he saith (z) [underlined: it is not absolutely to be denied bu that ye Devils
may exhibit the forms of Innocent persons if God permit it, who
may exhibit the forms of Innocent persons if God permit it, who
when he doth permit, usually
when he doth permit, usually]


[Margin notes:]
[Margin notes:]
Line 47: Line 47:
(w) p. 949.
(w) p. 949.


(x)Tyraus[?] de
(x)Tyraus de
apparitioni-
apparitioni-
bus. lib. 2
bus. lib. 2
cap. 14.
cap. 14.


(y) [??]
(y) Bringfeldins
de confessio-
de confessio-
nibus Pagarium.
nibus Pagarium.
Line 58: Line 58:


(z) disquis.
(z) disquis.
Magi.
Magic.
lib. 2. [?] 12. p. 143
lib. 2. [?] 12. p. 143

Latest revision as of 21:56, 2 July 2017

27

She declares he doth therefore mention it, that so Judges might be cautelous in their proceedings in cases of this nature in as much as the Devil doth often in that way intangle innocent persons & bring them into great troubles. His words are (t) [underlined: have historian ideo recito ut Judicus in Imjnsmodi casibus canti Sint Diabolus enim hac via Saepe immientibus intidiatur.]. He confirms w^t he saith by Reciting a passage out of [underlined: Albertus Gran- zius] who writes that the Devil was seen in the shape of a noble man to come out of the Empress her chamber. But to clear her Innocency, she (according to the Superstitious [underlined: Ordeals] then in fashion) walked blindfold over a great many glowing hot Irons without touching any of them. (u) (mr [underlined: Roetius] in his disputation of [underlined: Spectres] proposath that question whither the Devil may not untruly personate a godly man & answers in the Affirmative. And withall adds that it is a Sufficient argument (ad hominem) to Answer the Papists with their own histories, w^ch give instances of Satans appearing in the figure of Saints, nay of Christ himself & in his discourse concerning the [underlined: Operations of Daemons] (w) he hath the like problem whither ye Devil may not possibly put on the shape of a true Believer, a Real Saint, not only of Such as are dead, but still living; & Answers, [underlined: Quidni?] why not. It is bee true Popish [underlined: Casuists] (x) do generally incline to the Negative in the Question. Nevertheless the instance of [underlined: Germanus] w^o saw a compa -ny of honest people Represented by the Devils as if they had ben feasting together when they were Really asleep in their beds, doth a little puzzle them so as they are necessitated to take up with this conclusion (y) [underlined: that by an extraordinary permission of God Innocent persons may be Represented by Satan in the Nocturnal Conventicles of witches.] And if so, much more as afflicting bewitched persons. [underlined: Delrio] gives an Account of an Innocent Monk whose Reputation was endangered by a Demons appearing in his shape. He writes more like a Divine than Jesuites use to do when he saith (z) [underlined: it is not absolutely to be denied bu that ye Devils may exhibit the forms of Innocent persons if God permit it, who when he doth permit, usually]

[Margin notes:]

(t) de Spectris p. 86. 87.

(u) disp. Setect[?] vol. 1. p. 1008

(w) p. 949.

(x)Tyraus de apparitioni- bus. lib. 2 cap. 14.

(y) Bringfeldins de confessio- nibus Pagarium. p. 183. 191.

(z) disquis. Magic. lib. 2. [?] 12. p. 143