.MTA2NA.NzIzMjU: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hearthemelody
No edit summary
imported>Hearthemelody
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
rumor has, without contradiction, attributed the article to a  
rumor has, without contradiction, attributed the article to a  
member of the present cabinet, and to that member who [[staud?]]
member of the present cabinet, and to that member who [[staud?]]
charged with the department to which is confided the
administration of our Indian affairs. This circumstance, connected with
the marked deference with which the official Editor

Revision as of 20:50, 16 December 2019

etc. ayne. John Howard. Autograph manuscript relating to entitled "Publications Justifying the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Missionary Case" (Cherokee Indians). 33 pp 4to. back of this ?

justifying the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Missionary Case."

In the official paper published at Washington, the Globe, of Saturday, March 31. 1832, there is an essay of twelve columns headed "An examination of the Cherokee question", which seems intended as a review of the late decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the missionary cause. The Editor invites the attention of the country to this article by the assurance that "it is from the pen of one eminently qualified, by his intimacy with all that concerns in Indian relations, and by his legal and literary attainments, to do justice to the subject." Common rumor has, without contradiction, attributed the article to a member of the present cabinet, and to that member who staud? charged with the department to which is confided the administration of our Indian affairs. This circumstance, connected with the marked deference with which the official Editor