.NDI.MjIzNDE: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "never Suffer this to God. For both [illegible] former and [illegible] latter ages examples [moreof?] have not been wanting. no longer since the [illegible] winter [illegible]...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
never Suffer this to God. For both [illegible] former and [illegible] latter ages examples [moreof?] have not been wanting. no longer since the [illegible] winter [illegible] was much discourse in London concerning a [Gentle?] woman unto whom her dead Son (and another unto whom this [illegible] not) [illegible] disappeared. Coming [then?] in London I was willing to Satisfie my Self by Inquiring into the [2 crossed out words] truth of what was reported. And February 23 1691. my [Brother?] (who is now a Pastor to a congregation in that city) and I discoursed the [Gentle?] woman Spoken of. She told [us?] that a Son of hers who had been a very Civil young man, but more Airy in his temper than was pleasing to his Serious Mother, [being?] dead She was much concernd in her thoughts about his condition in the other world. But a fortnight after his death he appeard unto her, saying, mother you are [foli? folly?] [citory] [crossed out: of] about my Eternal welfare, trouble your self no more for I am happy. & so [illegible] vanished. Should this [Illegible] [illegible] continuall in her course between the visible & the invisi [word carried over] ble world, [would?] Greed Confusion. But [thomae?] to in [force?] that the great ruler of this Universe will never permitt anything of this nature to [be?], is an in--[word carried over] consequent conclusion. Let me further addhere it has [word crossed out: illegible]  very Seldom been known that Satan has personated an inocent man doing an ill thing. but [crossed out word: God] [Provedence?] hath found out Some way for their vindication Either they have been able to prove that they wer in another [place?] when that [fact?] was doing or the Like. so that perhaps the [word crossed out] [illegible] [son?] [crossed out: was] an instance of any inocent person condemned, in any court of [Indicature?] on Earth, only [know?] Satan deluding [be?] imposing on the ima [word carried over] ginations of men, when never the [illegible] the [witneses?], Juries [&?] Judges were all to be excused from blame.
never suffer this to bee. For both in former and  
in latter pages Examples herof have not been
wanting. No Longer since then the Last winter
ther was much discourse in London concerning
a Gentlewoman unto whom her dead son (and
another whom she knew not) had appeared. Being
then in London, I was willing to satisfie my self
by enquiring into the truth of what was reported.  
And February 23 1691 my Brother (who is now
a Pastor to a Congregation in that City) and I
discoursed the Gentlewoman spoken of. She told us
that a Son of hers who had been a very Civil
young man, but more Airy in his temper then
was pleasing to his serious Mother, being dead she was
much concerned in her thoughts about his condition
in the Other world. [    ] a fortnight after his death
he appeared unto her, saying, mother you are soli
citous about my eternal welfare, trouble yourself
no more for I am happy. & so vanishd. Should ther be a
continuall intercourse between the visible & the invisi
ble world, twould breed confusion. But thence to infere
that the great ruler of the Univers will never
permitt anything of this nature to be, is an in
consequent conclusion. let me further add, here, it
has very seldom been known that Satan has
personated an inocent man doing an ill thing.  
but providens hath found out some way for their vindication
either they have been able to prove that they were in another place
when that fact was doing or the Like. so that perhaps there never was
an instance of any inocent person condemned, in any court of
Judicature on Earth, only threw Satans deluding imposing on the ima
ginations of men, when nevertheless the Witnesses, Juries &
Judges were all to be excused from blame.

Revision as of 19:36, 30 June 2017

never suffer this to bee. For both in former and in latter pages Examples herof have not been wanting. No Longer since then the Last winter ther was much discourse in London concerning a Gentlewoman unto whom her dead son (and another whom she knew not) had appeared. Being then in London, I was willing to satisfie my self by enquiring into the truth of what was reported. And February 23 1691 my Brother (who is now a Pastor to a Congregation in that City) and I discoursed the Gentlewoman spoken of. She told us that a Son of hers who had been a very Civil young man, but more Airy in his temper then was pleasing to his serious Mother, being dead she was much concerned in her thoughts about his condition in the Other world. [ ] a fortnight after his death he appeared unto her, saying, mother you are soli citous about my eternal welfare, trouble yourself no more for I am happy. & so vanishd. Should ther be a continuall intercourse between the visible & the invisi ble world, twould breed confusion. But thence to infere that the great ruler of the Univers will never permitt anything of this nature to be, is an in consequent conclusion. let me further add, here, it has very seldom been known that Satan has personated an inocent man doing an ill thing. but providens hath found out some way for their vindication either they have been able to prove that they were in another place when that fact was doing or the Like. so that perhaps there never was an instance of any inocent person condemned, in any court of Judicature on Earth, only threw Satans deluding imposing on the ima ginations of men, when nevertheless the Witnesses, Juries & Judges were all to be excused from blame.