.NDI.MjIzNTk: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "the truth of that Gospel: but that Such a gift-- Should be annoseed so that Touch of [smear] wicked witches as an infallible Sign of their guilt is not easie to be believed. I...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
the truth of that Gospel: but that Such a gift--
the truth of that Gospel: but that Such a gift--
Should be annoseed so that Touch of [smear] wicked witches
Should be [annexed?] to the Touch of [smear] wicked witches
as an infallible Sign of their guilt is not easie to
as an infallible Sign of their guilt is not easie to
be believed. It is a thing ever known that if a per-
be beleived. It is a thing ever known that if a per=
son possessed by an Evil Spirit is (as often it so happen)
son possessed by an Evil Spirit is (as often it so happen)
never so outragious while a good man is praying
never so outragious whiles a good man is praying
with and for the afflicted, Let him Lay his hand on
with and for the Afflicted, Let him Lay his hand on
them and the Evil Spirit is Quiet. I hope this is no
them and the Evil Spirit is Quiet. I hope this is no
Evidence of any Covenant or voluntary Commu
Evidence of any Covenant or voluntary Commu
Line 11: Line 11:
Evil Spirit. No more doth that Case before us Evince
Evil Spirit. No more doth that Case before us Evince
any Such Thing.
any Such Thing.
4. Ther are that question the Lawfullness of the Expe-
4. Ther are that question the Lawfullness of the Expe=
riment. For if this healing power in the witch is
riment. For if this healing power in the witch is
not a Divine but a Diabolical gift it may be
not a Divine but a Diabolical gift it may be
dangerous to meddle too much with it. If the
dangerous to meddle too much with it. If the=
witch may be ordered to touch the afflicted persons
witch may be ordered to touch the Afflicted persons
in order to their healing or recovery out of a Sick
in order to their healing or recovery out of a Sick
fitt, why may not the deseased person be ordered
fitt, why may not the deseased person be ordered
to touch the witch for the Same Cause? & if touch
to touch the witch for the Same Cause? & if [scratched out letter] touch
him why not to Scratch him and to [??] blood
him why not to Scratch [scratched out word] him and to fetch blood
out of him which is but an harder kind of touch?
out of him which is but an harder kind of touch?
But as for this Jerkins doubts not to call it
But as for this Mr _Perkins_ doubts not to call it
a practice of witchcraft. It is not safe to medd
a _practice of witchcraft_. It is not safe to med
dle with any of the Divine Sacraments or institu
dle with any of the Divels Sacraments or institu
tions
tions

Revision as of 05:25, 1 July 2017

the truth of that Gospel: but that Such a gift-- Should be [annexed?] to the Touch of [smear] wicked witches as an infallible Sign of their guilt is not easie to be beleived. It is a thing ever known that if a per= son possessed by an Evil Spirit is (as often it so happen) never so outragious whiles a good man is praying with and for the Afflicted, Let him Lay his hand on them and the Evil Spirit is Quiet. I hope this is no Evidence of any Covenant or voluntary Commu nion between the good man that is praying and that Evil Spirit. No more doth that Case before us Evince any Such Thing. 4. Ther are that question the Lawfullness of the Expe= riment. For if this healing power in the witch is not a Divine but a Diabolical gift it may be dangerous to meddle too much with it. If the= witch may be ordered to touch the Afflicted persons in order to their healing or recovery out of a Sick fitt, why may not the deseased person be ordered to touch the witch for the Same Cause? & if [scratched out letter] touch him why not to Scratch [scratched out word] him and to fetch blood out of him which is but an harder kind of touch? But as for this Mr _Perkins_ doubts not to call it a _practice of witchcraft_. It is not safe to med dle with any of the Divels Sacraments or institu tions