.NDI.MjIzMzU: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
as well represent thom Committing [crossed out: Self] murder
as well represent thom Committing [crossed out: Self] murder
and If so thon would thor be no Living in tho world.
and If so thon would thor be no Living in tho world.
But  I {hern?] tho Argument against thom. [illegible]
But  I [hern?] tho Argument against thom. [illegible]
I beemay (as tho mentioned in stanos Trove) perso-
I beemay (as tho mentioned in stanos Trove) perso-
nate honst mon as doing other Evils. And no
nate honst mon as doing other Evils. And no
Solic Reason can be given why he may not as
Solic Reason can be given why he may not as
well personate thom under the [nohon?] of witches as
well personate thom under the [name?] of witches as
under thos nohon of Thieves, Murderers, & Idola=
under thos name of Thieves, Murderers, & Idola=
tors. As for tho objection that thon ther would be
tors. As for tho objection that thon ther would be
no Living in the world, we shall consider that un=
no Living in the world, we shall consider that un=
Line 28: Line 28:
he wants either will or Power to doe this, or because
he wants either will or Power to doe this, or because
God will never permitt him to doe so. No man
God will never permitt him to doe so. No man
but [?] doublts of tho Ill will of Divell.
but [?] doubts of tho Ill will of Divell.





Revision as of 18:41, 30 June 2017

15 [underlined: Guell] Saith of him that he must ingeniously confess that he never understood Solomons proverbs until [underlined: Lavator] Expounded them to him. That book of his [underlined: DeSpeitris] has boon Published in Latin Greek hish and Low Dutch, French, Italian. Tho [Scar=] ned [underllined: Zanchy] (+)Speakes highly of it, professing that he had read it both with Pleasure and pro= fitt. [underlined: Vochin] (a) [fakes nohio?] of that passage [illegible: rise] have [crossed out 1 word] Quoted out of [underlined: Lavator] as a thing memorable. Some Popish Authors argue that the Divel cannot personate the such as an [crossed out 1 word] Inocont do= ing an act of Witchcraft because [thombo?] might as well represent thom Committing [crossed out: Self] murder and If so thon would thor be no Living in tho world. But I [hern?] tho Argument against thom. [illegible] I beemay (as tho mentioned in stanos Trove) perso- nate honst mon as doing other Evils. And no Solic Reason can be given why he may not as well personate thom under the [name?] of witches as under thos name of Thieves, Murderers, & Idola= tors. As for tho objection that thon ther would be no Living in the world, we shall consider that un= der tho [noser?] Argument. Argument. If Satan may not represent one that is not a Covenant Servant of his as affecting those that are [crossed out: affected] bewitched or [?], thon he because he wants either will or Power to doe this, or because God will never permitt him to doe so. No man but [?] doubts of tho Ill will of Divell.


[In Margin: (+)Episol. 2 (a)in dispute de Magia. 525]