.NDI.MjIzMzU: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Juell saith of him that he must ingeniously confess that he never understood Solomons proverbs [crossed out: which] untill [illegible] Lavater expounded them to him. That book of his De Spectris has been published in Latin Greek, high and Low Dutch, French, Italian. The [Sca..ned?} Zanchy (+) speakes highly of it, professing that he had read it both with Pleasure and profitt. [Vochin?] (a) takes notice of that passage we have quoted [crossed out: illegible] out of Lavater as a thing memorable. Some Popish Authority argue that the Divel cannot personate [crossed out: illegible] as are inocent doing an Act of Witchcraft because them he might as well represent them committing [crossed out: self] murder and if so then would there be no Living in the world. But I [hirn?] the Argument against them;  [crossed out: illegible]. I bee may (as the mentioned instances prove) personate honest men as doing other Evils. And no solid reason can be given why he may not as well personate them under the notion of witches as under the notion of theeves, murderers, & Idolaters. As for the objection that then there would be no Living in the world, we shall consider that under the next Argument.
15
Argument 3 If Satan may not represent one that is not a Covenant Servant of his as afflicting those that are [crossed out: affected] bewitched or possessed, then tis because he wants either will, or Power to doe this, or because God will never permitt him to doe so. No man but a Saducee doubts of the Illwill of Divells.
[underlined: Guell] Saith of him that he must ingeniously confess
that he never understood Solomons proverbs
until [underlined: Lavator] Expounded them to him. That book  
of his [underlined: DeSpeitris] has boon Published in Latin
Greek hish and Low Dutch, French, Italian. Tho [Scar=]
ned [underllined: Zanchy] (+)Speakes highly of it, professing
that he had read it both with Pleasure and pro=
fitt. [underlined: Vochin] (a) [fakes nohio?] of that passage [illegible: rise]
have [crossed out 1 word] Quoted out of [underlined: Lavator] as a thing
memorable. Some Popish Authors argue that
the Divel cannot personate the such as an [crossed out 1 word] Inocont do=
ing an act of Witchcraft because [thombo?] might
as well represent thom Committing [crossed out: Self] murder
and If so thon would thor be no Living in tho world.
But I {hern?] tho Argument against thom. [illegible]
I beemay (as tho mentioned in stanos Trove) perso-
nate honst mon as doing other Evils. And no
Solic Reason can be given why he may not as
well personate thom under the [nohon?] of witches as
under thos nohon of Thieves, Murderers, & Idola=
tors. As for tho objection that thon ther would be
no Living in the world, we shall consider that un=
der tho [noser?] Argument.
 
 
[In Margin: (+)Episol. 2
(a)in dispute
de Magia.
525]

Revision as of 18:38, 30 June 2017

15 [underlined: Guell] Saith of him that he must ingeniously confess that he never understood Solomons proverbs until [underlined: Lavator] Expounded them to him. That book of his [underlined: DeSpeitris] has boon Published in Latin Greek hish and Low Dutch, French, Italian. Tho [Scar=] ned [underllined: Zanchy] (+)Speakes highly of it, professing that he had read it both with Pleasure and pro= fitt. [underlined: Vochin] (a) [fakes nohio?] of that passage [illegible: rise] have [crossed out 1 word] Quoted out of [underlined: Lavator] as a thing memorable. Some Popish Authors argue that the Divel cannot personate the such as an [crossed out 1 word] Inocont do= ing an act of Witchcraft because [thombo?] might as well represent thom Committing [crossed out: Self] murder and If so thon would thor be no Living in tho world. But I {hern?] tho Argument against thom. [illegible] I beemay (as tho mentioned in stanos Trove) perso- nate honst mon as doing other Evils. And no Solic Reason can be given why he may not as well personate thom under the [nohon?] of witches as under thos nohon of Thieves, Murderers, & Idola= tors. As for tho objection that thon ther would be no Living in the world, we shall consider that un= der tho [noser?] Argument.


[In Margin: (+)Episol. 2 (a)in dispute de Magia. 525]

Retrieved from "https://digital.newberry.org/transcribe/wiki/index.php?title=.NDI.MjIzMzU&oldid=4362"