.NDI.MjIzMzU: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[underlined word] Juell [?] saith of him that he [caret sign. Inserted word: most] ingeniously confess
15
[underlined: Guell] Saith of him that he must ingeniously confess
that he never understood Solomons proverbs
that he never understood Solomons proverbs
[striked out text. Illegible] untill Lavater expounded them to him. That book
until [underlined: Lavator] Expounded them to him. That book  
of his, de Spectris, has been published in Latin
of his [underlined: DeSpeitris] has boon Published in Latin
Greek, [caret sign. Inserted word: high] and low Dutch, French, Italian. The lear=
Greek hish and Low Dutch, French, Italian. Tho [Scar=]
ned [underlined word] Zanchy (+) speakes highly of it, professing
ned [underllined: Zanchy] (+)Speakes highly of it, professing
that he had read it both with pleasure and pro=
that he had read it both with Pleasure and pro=
fitt. [underlined word] Voetius (a) takes notice of that passage we
fitt. [underlined: Vochin] (a) [fakes nohio?] of that passage [illegible: rise]
have quoted out of [underlined word] Lavater as a thing
have [crossed out 1 word] Quoted out of [underlined: Lavator] as a thing
memorable. Some Popish Authors argue that
memorable. Some Popish Authors argue that
the Divel cannot personate [striked out text. Illegible.] an inocent do=
the Divel cannot personate the such as an [crossed out 1 word] Inocont do=
ing an Act of Witchcraft because then he might
ing an act of Witchcraft because [thombo?] might
as well represent them committing [striked out text: Self] murder,
as well represent  
and if so, then would there be no living in the world.
 
But I turn the argument against them, and [?]
 
He may (as the mentioned instances prove) perso=
[In Margin: (+)Episol. 2
nate honest men as doing other Evils. And no
(a)in dispute
solid reason can be given why he may not as
de Magia.
well personate them under the notion of witches as
525]
under the notion of thieves, murderers,  & Idola=
tors. As for the Objection that then there would be
no Living in the world, we shall consider that un=
der the next Argument.
Argument 3 If Satan may not represent one
that is not a Covenant Servant of his as afflicting
those that are bewitched or possessed, then is [?] because
we wants either will, or Power to do this, or because
God will never permitt him to do so. No man
but a Saducee doubts of the Ill will of Divells.

Revision as of 18:29, 30 June 2017

15 [underlined: Guell] Saith of him that he must ingeniously confess that he never understood Solomons proverbs until [underlined: Lavator] Expounded them to him. That book of his [underlined: DeSpeitris] has boon Published in Latin Greek hish and Low Dutch, French, Italian. Tho [Scar=] ned [underllined: Zanchy] (+)Speakes highly of it, professing that he had read it both with Pleasure and pro= fitt. [underlined: Vochin] (a) [fakes nohio?] of that passage [illegible: rise] have [crossed out 1 word] Quoted out of [underlined: Lavator] as a thing memorable. Some Popish Authors argue that the Divel cannot personate the such as an [crossed out 1 word] Inocont do= ing an act of Witchcraft because [thombo?] might as well represent


[In Margin: (+)Episol. 2 (a)in dispute de Magia. 525]

Retrieved from "https://digital.newberry.org/transcribe/wiki/index.php?title=.NDI.MjIzMzU&oldid=4358"