.NDI.MjIzMjY: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Form of innocent persons out of those convotrians & that (ther? - illegible) is no question to God made of it,  but (crossed out illegible) as to his natural pon r and art he is able to make their shapes appear among his Servant, but no supposeth ho providence of God will not suffer such an injury to be done to an innocent person 10th him (m) Delrio and S(illegible) con cure Cumanmy in his Lucorna Inquisitorium (a book I have not yet seen) defends the affirmative of this Question. Binsfieldins(? and something crossed out) in his treatise concerning the confession of witches inclines to tho negative: only (o) he acknowlodges that Dei extraordinaria permissione posse (niocontes?) sic representari. And hee that shall assert that the great and holy God never did nor ever will permitt the Divel (this?) far to abuse an inocent person, affirms more then he is able to prove. The story of Germanus his discovering of a Diabolicall illusion of this nature concerning a great number of persons that seemed to be at a feast when they were really at home & (a sheep?) is mentioned by many authors. But the Particulars insisted on (illeg) Sufficiently (illeg) the truth of what (illeg). that the Divel may by Divine permission appear in the shape of (crossed out illegible) inocent and pious persons. Never the less, tis evident from another Scripture viz that in the 2 Cor. 11. 14 ^ _[illegible] Satan Himselfe is transformed into an Angell of Light_. Hee seems to be what their not
Form of innocent persons out of those conventions & that ther is no question to bee made of it,  but (crossed out illegible) ^ as to his natural pow^r and art he is able to make their [crossed out word: power?] shapes appear among his Servants, but he (L) supposeth the providence of God will not suffer such an injury to be done to an inocent person w^th him (m) _Delrio_ , and _Spin[crossed out letter]us_ concr.  _Cumancy_ in his _Lucerna Inquisitorium_ (a book I have not yet seen) defends the affirmative of this Question. _Binsfieldins_ [crossed out citation] in his treatise concerning the con=fession of witches inclines to tho negative: only (o) he acknowledges that _Dei extraordinaria permissione posse niocentes ^sic representari._ And ^hee that shall assert that the great and holy God nev^r did nor ever will permitt the Divel thus far to abuse an inocent person, affirms more then he is able to prove. The story of _Germanus_ his discovering of a Diabolicall illusion of this nature concerning a great number of persons that seemed to be at a feast when they were really at home & a= sleep is mentioned by many authors. But the Particulars insisted on he Sufficiently lived the truth of what wee assert viz. that the Divel may by Divine permission appear in the shape of [crossed out illegible] inocent and [crossed out letter] pious persons. Never the less, tis evident from another Scripture viz that in the 2 Cor. 11. 14 ^ _[illegible] Satan Himselfe is transformed into an Angell of Light_. Hee seems to be what their not

Revision as of 17:15, 1 July 2017

Form of innocent persons out of those conventions & that ther is no question to bee made of it, but (crossed out illegible) ^ as to his natural pow^r and art he is able to make their [crossed out word: power?] shapes appear among his Servants, but he (L) supposeth the providence of God will not suffer such an injury to be done to an inocent person w^th him (m) _Delrio_ , and _Spin[crossed out letter]us_ concr. _Cumancy_ in his _Lucerna Inquisitorium_ (a book I have not yet seen) defends the affirmative of this Question. _Binsfieldins_ [crossed out citation] in his treatise concerning the con=fession of witches inclines to tho negative: only (o) he acknowledges that _Dei extraordinaria permissione posse niocentes ^sic representari._ And ^hee that shall assert that the great and holy God nev^r did nor ever will permitt the Divel thus far to abuse an inocent person, affirms more then he is able to prove. The story of _Germanus_ his discovering of a Diabolicall illusion of this nature concerning a great number of persons that seemed to be at a feast when they were really at home & a= sleep is mentioned by many authors. But the Particulars insisted on he Sufficiently lived the truth of what wee assert viz. that the Divel may by Divine permission appear in the shape of [crossed out illegible] inocent and [crossed out letter] pious persons. Never the less, tis evident from another Scripture viz that in the 2 Cor. 11. 14 ^ _[illegible] Satan Himselfe is transformed into an Angell of Light_. Hee seems to be what their not