.NDI.MjIzMjY

Form of innocent persons out of those convotrians & that (ther? - illegible) is no question to God made of it, but (crossed out illegible) as to his natural pon r and art he is able to make their shapes appear among his Servant, but no supposeth ho providence of God will not suffer such an injury to be done to an innocent person 10th him (m) Delrio and S(illegible) con cure Cumanmy in his Lucorna Inquisitorium (a book I have not yet seen) defends (illeg) affirmative of this Question. Binsfieldins(? and something crossed out) in his treatise concerning the Fefsion (?) of witches inclines to tho negative: only (o) he acknowlodges that Dei extraordinaria permissione posse (niocontes?) sic representari. And hee that shall assert that the great and holy God never did nor ever will permitt the Divel (this?) far to abuse an inocent person, affirms more then he is able to prove. The story of Germanus his discovering of a Diabolicall illusion of this nature concerning a great number of persons that seemed to be at a feast when they were really at home & (a sheep?) is mentioned by many authors. But the Particulars insisted on (?) Sufficiently