.NDI.MjIzMjY: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Form of innocent persons out of those convotrians (E?) (illegible) is no question to God made of it, but (crossed out illegible) as to his natural pon r and art he is able to make their shapes appear among his Servant, but no supposeth ho providence of God will not suffer such an injury to be done to an innocent person 10th him (( Delrio and S(illegible) con cure Cumanmy in his Lucorna Inquisitorium (a book I have not yet seen) defends (illeg) affirmative of this Question. Innsfieloin (? and something crossed out) in his treatise concerning the con-fesion of witches inclines to tho negative: only (o) he acknowlodges that | Form of innocent persons out of those convotrians (E?) (illegible) is no question to God made of it, but (crossed out illegible) as to his natural pon r and art he is able to make their shapes appear among his Servant, but no supposeth ho providence of God will not suffer such an injury to be done to an innocent person 10th him (( Delrio and S(illegible) con cure Cumanmy in his Lucorna Inquisitorium (a book I have not yet seen) defends (illeg) affirmative of this Question. Innsfieloin (? and something crossed out) in his treatise concerning the con-fesion of witches inclines to tho negative: only (o) he acknowlodges that Dei extraordinariapermife (?) sione pofso inioconte ^ Sie rd presentari. And ^ thee that shall afsert that tho great and holy God never did nor ever will permitt the Divel thus far to abuse an inocent person, affirms more than he is able to prove. The story of Germany his discovering of a Diabolicall illusion of this nature concern ing a great number of persons that learned to go | ||
Revision as of 14:35, 30 June 2017
Form of innocent persons out of those convotrians (E?) (illegible) is no question to God made of it, but (crossed out illegible) as to his natural pon r and art he is able to make their shapes appear among his Servant, but no supposeth ho providence of God will not suffer such an injury to be done to an innocent person 10th him (( Delrio and S(illegible) con cure Cumanmy in his Lucorna Inquisitorium (a book I have not yet seen) defends (illeg) affirmative of this Question. Innsfieloin (? and something crossed out) in his treatise concerning the con-fesion of witches inclines to tho negative: only (o) he acknowlodges that Dei extraordinariapermife (?) sione pofso inioconte ^ Sie rd presentari. And ^ thee that shall afsert that tho great and holy God never did nor ever will permitt the Divel thus far to abuse an inocent person, affirms more than he is able to prove. The story of Germany his discovering of a Diabolicall illusion of this nature concern ing a great number of persons that learned to go