.NDI.MjIzMjM: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Chrisan | Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Chrisan | ||
Doctors (b) and many Late Popish (c) authors amongst | |||
whom _Corn-a-Lapide (d) is most Elaborate. but that | |||
it was a [underlined] Demon [underlined] representing Samuel hath been | |||
Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especially by _Peter Martyr_, (f) _Balduinus_, ([crossed out letter]) _Lavater_, & our in= | |||
comparable (g) _John Rainold_. I shall not here insist on | |||
hearing of that, Especially considering that (h) elsewhere | |||
I have done it. Only lett me now add that ye witch | |||
said to Saul I [word crossed out] see [underlined] Elohim.[underlined] (i.e) [underlined]a God[underlined] (for the whole | |||
Context shews that a Single person is intended) [underlined] ascend= | |||
ing out of the Earth [underlined]; 1 Sam^ll [illegible] 13. the Divel would | |||
be worshipped as a God and Saul now that ^hee was become | |||
a [underlined] Necromancer [underlined] must bow to him. Moreover, had | |||
it been the true Samuel from Heaven Reprehend= | |||
ing Saul, thers great reason to think that he would | |||
not only have reproved him for his sin in not exe= | |||
cuting judgem^t on the Amalekites as in vs. 18. but | |||
for his wickedness in Consulting w^th familiar Spirits; for | |||
which Sin it was in Speciall that he dyed Chron.10.15 | |||
but in as much as ther is not one word to testifie ag^st | |||
that abomination wee may conclude that twas | |||
not real Sam^el that appeard to Saul. and if it were | |||
the Divel in his likeness the argument seems very | |||
strong, that if the Divel may appear in the forme of | |||
a Saint in glory much more is it possible for him to | |||
put on the likness of the most pious & inocent saint on | |||
[Notes in the margins]: | [Notes in the margins]: | ||
Revision as of 16:42, 1 July 2017
Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Chrisan Doctors (b) and many Late Popish (c) authors amongst whom _Corn-a-Lapide (d) is most Elaborate. but that it was a [underlined] Demon [underlined] representing Samuel hath been Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especially by _Peter Martyr_, (f) _Balduinus_, ([crossed out letter]) _Lavater_, & our in= comparable (g) _John Rainold_. I shall not here insist on hearing of that, Especially considering that (h) elsewhere I have done it. Only lett me now add that ye witch said to Saul I [word crossed out] see [underlined] Elohim.[underlined] (i.e) [underlined]a God[underlined] (for the whole Context shews that a Single person is intended) [underlined] ascend= ing out of the Earth [underlined]; 1 Sam^ll [illegible] 13. the Divel would be worshipped as a God and Saul now that ^hee was become a [underlined] Necromancer [underlined] must bow to him. Moreover, had it been the true Samuel from Heaven Reprehend= ing Saul, thers great reason to think that he would not only have reproved him for his sin in not exe= cuting judgem^t on the Amalekites as in vs. 18. but for his wickedness in Consulting w^th familiar Spirits; for which Sin it was in Speciall that he dyed Chron.10.15 but in as much as ther is not one word to testifie ag^st that abomination wee may conclude that twas not real Sam^el that appeard to Saul. and if it were the Divel in his likeness the argument seems very
strong, that if the Divel may appear in the forme of
a Saint in glory much more is it possible for him to put on the likness of the most pious & inocent saint on
[Notes in the margins]:
(a) R. Saadia, R. Eleazar, R: Athias, Lyrzanus, Sic & Joseph (b) Ambrose & Hierom Basil, Nazianzen. (c) Thom[a]s, Tostatus, Suarez, Cajetan. (d) In Ecclesiastic. cap. 46 vs. 23. (f) In 2 Cor. 11 p. 555 (g) In libr. Apocryph. (h) Remark. provid. p. 211