.NDI.MjIzMjM: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Christian Doctors (b) and many late Popish (c) authors amongst whom [corn-a-Lapide?] is most Elaborate. but that it was a Demon [underlined] representing Samuel hath been Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especially by Peter Martyr (†) Balduinius Lavater [underlined] & our incomparable Jo^(g)hn Rainold. I shall not more insist on warning of that, Especially considering that ^(h) elsewhere I have done it. Only lett me now add that ye witch said to Saul [word crossed out - Jesus?] see Elohim [underlined]. (i.e.) a God [underlined] for the whole Contest shows that a Single person is intended ascending out of the Earth [underlined]; 1 Sam^ll. [scored out] 13. The Divel would be worshiped as a God and Saul now that ^hee was become a necromancer [underlined] must bow to him. Moreover, had it been the true Samuel from Heaven Reprehending Saul, [illegible - thou? there?] great reasaon to think that he would not only have reproved him for his sin in not executing Judgem^t on the Amalokites as in ps 18. but for his wickedness in Consulting w^th familiar Spirits; for which in it was in Speciall that he dyed Chron.so.18 but in as much as there is not one word to testifie ag^st that abomination wee may conclude that twas not real Sam^ll that appeard to Saul and if it were the Divel in his Likeness the argument seems very Strong, that if the Divel may appear in the forme of a Saint in glory much more is it possible for him to put on the Likness of the most pious & inocent Saint on
Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Christian Doctors (b) and many [?] Sopish (c) authors amongst whom [corn-a-Lapide?] is most Elaborate but that it was a Demon representing Samuel hath been Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especially by Peter Martyr (†) [baldouines?] [Lavater?] & our incomparable John [Rainold?]. I shall not more insist on hearing of that, Especially considering that (h) elsewhere I have done it. Only lett me now add that if witch said to Saul [word crossed out - Jesus?] see Elohim. (i.e) a God for the [whols?]ing out of the Earth; Sam [illegible] 13. the Divel would be worshipped as a God and Saul now that hee was become a necromancer must bow to him. Moreover, had it been [this?] [true?] Samuel from Heaven [Reprehending?] Saul, [this?] great reason to think that he would not only have reproved him for his sin in not [cocecuating?] judgement on [illegible] as in fg. 18. but for his wickedness in Consulting with familiar Spirits, for which Sin it was in Speciall that this dyed Chron.10.15 but in as much as [illegible] is not one word to [testifie agst?] that abomination wee may conclude that [illegible] not real Sam that appeard to Saul. and if it were the Divel in his likeness [illegible] argument seems very strong, that if the Divel may appear in the forme of a Saint in glory much more is it possible for him to put on the likeness of [that?] most pious [inocent?] saint on
 
[in margin - guessing these are prophet names]
(a) Kaldias [?] the Eloarary [illegible] Eyrzamunsick Jose^sp
 
b) Ambros[?] Hieron Basienazianzer
 
c) Thom^s [crossed out] Setatry [?]
hoares plajetan. [Latin?]
 
(d) In 2 whiss apic. cap. 46. pg. 23.
 
(e) in 2 cor. 11. p. 555
 
(g) In like Apocalypse [?]
 
(k) Remark.parr'd. p. 211

Revision as of 00:02, 1 July 2017

Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Christian Doctors (b) and many [?] Sopish (c) authors amongst whom [corn-a-Lapide?] is most Elaborate but that it was a Demon representing Samuel hath been Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especially by Peter Martyr (†) [baldouines?] [Lavater?] & our incomparable John [Rainold?]. I shall not more insist on hearing of that, Especially considering that (h) elsewhere I have done it. Only lett me now add that if witch said to Saul [word crossed out - Jesus?] see Elohim. (i.e) a God for the [whols?]ing out of the Earth; Sam [illegible] 13. the Divel would be worshipped as a God and Saul now that hee was become a necromancer must bow to him. Moreover, had it been [this?] [true?] Samuel from Heaven [Reprehending?] Saul, [this?] great reason to think that he would not only have reproved him for his sin in not [cocecuating?] judgement on [illegible] as in fg. 18. but for his wickedness in Consulting with familiar Spirits, for which Sin it was in Speciall that this dyed Chron.10.15 but in as much as [illegible] is not one word to [testifie agst?] that abomination wee may conclude that [illegible] not real Sam that appeard to Saul. and if it were the Divel in his likeness [illegible] argument seems very strong, that if the Divel may appear in the forme of a Saint in glory much more is it possible for him to put on the likeness of [that?] most pious [inocent?] saint on