.NDI.MjIzMjI: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
(New hand)
 
The first Case [underlined] which I am desired to express  
The first Case [underlined] which I am desired to express  
my judgmen^t in, is this, [underlined: Whether it is not  
my judgmen^t in, is this, [underlined: Whether it is not  
possible for the Divel to impose on the im
possible for the Divel to impose on the im
[crossed out: m]aginations of persons bewitched and  
[crossed out: m]aginations of persons bewitched and  
to cause them to beleive if ^t an Inocent, yea
to cause them to beleive yt an Inocent, yea
that a pious person does torment them =  
that a pious person does torment them =  
when y^e Div^l himself doth it, or whether  
when y^e Div^l himself doth it, or whether  
Line 21: Line 21:
I am not Ignorant that some have offered that  
I am not Ignorant that some have offered that  
which if it were proved would evert this ar=
which if it were proved would evert this ar=
gum^t viz: that it was the true and not [crossed out word] a de=
gum^t viz: that it was the true and not [crossed out: the] a de=
lusive Samuel which the witch brought to  
lusive Samuel which the witch brought to  
converse with Saul. Of this Opinion are
converse with Saul. Of this Opinion are

Revision as of 03:56, 24 July 2017

The first Case [underlined] which I am desired to express my judgmen^t in, is this, [underlined: Whether it is not possible for the Divel to impose on the im [crossed out: m]aginations of persons bewitched and to cause them to beleive yt an Inocent, yea that a pious person does torment them = when y^e Div^l himself doth it, or whether Satan may not appear in the shape of a pious & Inocent as well as in the shape of a nocent & wicked person to afflict such as suffer - by Diabolical molestations?] The [underlined: Answer] to the Question must be [underlined: Affirma tive]. Let the following Arguments bee duely= weighed in the Ballance of the Sanctuary. Argum. 1. Ther are Severall Scriptures from which wee may infer the possibility of what is affirmed. 1. Wee find [underlined: that the Divel by the instigation of the witch at Endor ap= =peard in the Likeness of the Prophet Samuel]. I am not Ignorant that some have offered that which if it were proved would evert this ar= gum^t viz: that it was the true and not [crossed out: the] a de= lusive Samuel which the witch brought to converse with Saul. Of this Opinion are