.MTAwNA.NjU4MjQ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
My Dear General | My Dear General | ||
I am exceedingly obliged for your letter of the 2nd. inst & I sincerely hope that the scheme for extending the Dever & Rio Grande R. R. through Valentine to Presidio Del Norte may take shape & develop Western Texas. It is only a question of time where this whole country will be net-worked with railroads. White Oaks seems to be an objective point from north as well as South. The scheme for extending the Denver Texas & Ft Worth (now built to Trinidad & in this direction running up | I am exceedingly obliged for your letter of the 2nd. inst & I sincerely hope that the scheme for extending the Dever & Rio Grande R. R. through Valentine to Presidio Del Norte may take shape & develop Western Texas. It is only a question of time where this whole country will be net-worked with railroads. White Oaks seems to be an objective point from north as well as South. The scheme for extending the Denver Texas & Ft Worth (now built to Trinidad & in this direction running up Long's Can, while it runs from Trinidan over Denver & Rio Grande to Denver) | ||
Revision as of 21:44, 2 June 2019
Fort Union N. M. October 4th 88
My Dear General
I am exceedingly obliged for your letter of the 2nd. inst & I sincerely hope that the scheme for extending the Dever & Rio Grande R. R. through Valentine to Presidio Del Norte may take shape & develop Western Texas. It is only a question of time where this whole country will be net-worked with railroads. White Oaks seems to be an objective point from north as well as South. The scheme for extending the Denver Texas & Ft Worth (now built to Trinidad & in this direction running up Long's Can, while it runs from Trinidan over Denver & Rio Grande to Denver)