.MTA2NA.NzIyMjA: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hearthemelody
(Created page with "obligations to individuals - first branch - commission")
 
imported>Hearthemelody
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
individuals -
individuals -
first branch -
first branch -
commission
commission under
the 17th article
 
entirely, and sometimes partly, denied payment,
under these various heads, in the face of the
clearest evidence that their statements indisputable.
3d. That against Cherokees
who were not favoured, debts were unjustly
permitted to be proven by those who were,
and that thus such wronged Cherokees were
still further wronged.
4th. That, in certain cases,
although the first clause of the ninth section of
the Treaty promises "a just and fair valuation
of all improvements," the Commission refused
even to make such valuation,
under the pretense of not having funds in hand
to pay for them.
5th. That, in other cases,
valuations of very extensive improvements
were made without any consultation with
the owners, and debts permitted to be proven
against them, both manifestly unfair, and
that, instances occurred where the owners of
improvements thus under-rated, being under
duress, although they from necessity took the
balance awarded after the deduction from
of unjust claims for pretended debt,
felt if due to themselves and their families
and their country to accompany the reception
with a protest.
6th. That there was gross
collusion

Revision as of 22:42, 22 March 2019

obligations to individuals - first branch - commission under the 17th article

entirely, and sometimes partly, denied payment, under these various heads, in the face of the clearest evidence that their statements indisputable. 3d. That against Cherokees who were not favoured, debts were unjustly permitted to be proven by those who were, and that thus such wronged Cherokees were still further wronged. 4th. That, in certain cases, although the first clause of the ninth section of the Treaty promises "a just and fair valuation of all improvements," the Commission refused even to make such valuation, under the pretense of not having funds in hand to pay for them. 5th. That, in other cases, valuations of very extensive improvements were made without any consultation with the owners, and debts permitted to be proven

against them, both manifestly unfair, and

that, instances occurred where the owners of improvements thus under-rated, being under duress, although they from necessity took the balance awarded after the deduction from of unjust claims for pretended debt, felt if due to themselves and their families and their country to accompany the reception with a protest. 6th. That there was gross collusion