.NDI.MjIzMTY: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
an Evidence Supposed to be in the Testimony which is heavily to be Weighed, & if it does​ not infallibly prove the Crime against the person accused, it ought not to determine him guilty of it for so righteous men may be condemned unjustly. In case of Witchcraft we know that the Devil is the immediate agent in the mischief done, the consent or compact of the witch is the thing to be demonstrated.
an Evidence Supposed to be in the Testimony
Among many arguments to evince this that which is most under present debate, is that which -- something vulgarly called _spectre evidence_ and a certain sort of ordeal or thrall (trial) by this Sight and Touch. The principal plea to justify the convictive evidence is fetched from the consideration of the wisdom and justice of God in governing the works in which they suppose would fail if such things were permitted to befall an innocent person, but it is certain that too [absolute?] 【resolute?]conclusions drawn from Hence, are bold usurpations upon Spotless Sovereignty , & tho some things if suffered to be common would subvert this Government & disband yea ruine Humane Society; yet God doth sometime suffer such things.
which is the only to be Weighed, & if it does
not infallibly prove the Crime against the
person accused, it ought not to determine
him Guilty of it forso righteous, men may
be condemned unjustly. In case of witchcraft
we know that the Divel is the imediate agent
in the mischeif done, the Consent or Compact of
the witch is the thing to be demonstratted.
Among many Arguments to evince this that
which is most under present debate is that  
which refers to something vulgarly called _Spec-
tre evidence_ and a certain sort of ordeal
or tryall by the Sight and Touch. The princi-
pal plea to justify the convictive evidence of[?]
those is fetched from the consideration of the wis-
dome and Justice of God in Governing the work
which they suppose would fail if such things
were permitted to befall an incocent person.
but it is certain that too resolute conclusi-
ons drawn from Hence, are bold usurpations
upon spotless[?] _Soveraignty_, & the somethings
if suffered to be common would subvert this
Government & disband yea ruins Humane
Society; yet God doth sometimes suffer such
things.

Revision as of 22:35, 30 June 2017

an Evidence Supposed to be in the Testimony which is the only to be Weighed, & if it does not infallibly prove the Crime against the person accused, it ought not to determine him Guilty of it forso righteous, men may be condemned unjustly. In case of witchcraft we know that the Divel is the imediate agent in the mischeif done, the Consent or Compact of the witch is the thing to be demonstratted. Among many Arguments to evince this that which is most under present debate is that which refers to something vulgarly called _Spec- tre evidence_ and a certain sort of ordeal or tryall by the Sight and Touch. The princi- pal plea to justify the convictive evidence of[?] those is fetched from the consideration of the wis- dome and Justice of God in Governing the work which they suppose would fail if such things were permitted to befall an incocent person. but it is certain that too resolute conclusi- ons drawn from Hence, are bold usurpations upon spotless[?] _Soveraignty_, & the somethings if suffered to be common would subvert this Government & disband yea ruins Humane Society; yet God doth sometimes suffer such things.