.MTUyOA.MTMzNzE2: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
other "reds" had used such language in their propaganda, it would have been regarded as [[ seditions?]] .
other "reds" had used such language in their propaganda, it would have been regarded as seditious.
   The Unites States daily furnishes the facts to Counter act this [[dangerous]]?) hysteria, which, [[ unclear]], need to be [[ unclear ]] and interpreted to those whom it does not Back.
   The United States Daily furnishes the facts to Counteract this dangerous hysteria, which, [[ unclear]], need to be redistributed and interpreted to those whom it does not reach.


     This I am doing, as [[ opportunity offers /]] , in my Column in the Daily News. Which is now [[unclear] its 30th year
     This I am doing, as opportunity offers, in my Column in the Daily News - which is now rounding out its 30th year

Latest revision as of 04:12, 9 May 2023

other "reds" had used such language in their propaganda, it would have been regarded as seditious.

  The United States Daily furnishes the facts to Counteract this dangerous hysteria, which, unclear, need to be redistributed and interpreted to those whom it does not reach.
   This I am doing, as opportunity offers, in my Column in the Daily News - which is now rounding out its 30th year