.MTM5Nw.MTIwNzY3: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "18 the vasopressor and a person for the dilator. In that way he was able to explain whatever happened. I was quite inexperienced in the world of research at that time and I...") |
CastleCourt (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
18 | 18 | ||
the vasopressor and a | the vasopressor and a pressor for the dilator. In that way | ||
he was able to explain whatever happened. I was quite | he was able to explain whatever happened. I was quite | ||
inexperienced in the world of research at that time and I was | inexperienced in the world of research at that time and I was | ||
vastly impressed by this vascular | vastly impressed by this vascular microcosm conjured up | ||
by the | by the inventor's wand. The only thing was, I couldn't decide | ||
whether I should believe it or not. Finally I asked somebody | whether I should believe it or not. Finally I asked somebody | ||
from P & S whether all of this had been confirmed in some | from P & S whether all of this had been confirmed in some | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
it would take someone else half a lifetime to repeat it and | it would take someone else half a lifetime to repeat it and | ||
nobody is sufficiently interested to give the time to it." I | nobody is sufficiently interested to give the time to it." I | ||
gathered that most groups took a | gathered that most groups took a dim view of the whole story, although | ||
the journals published the | the journals published the paper, probably because they | ||
couldn't deny it any more than they could confirm it. So far as | couldn't deny it any more than they could confirm it. So far as | ||
I know, the whole theory was lost sight of and to this day I don't | I know, the whole theory was lost sight of and to this day I don't | ||
know whether the author was an enthusiast, a prophet or an | know whether the author was an enthusiast, a prophet or an | ||
impostor. But that was a picturesque phenomenon of that | |||
period a curious exception in a history which, not so long before | period a curious exception in a history which, not so long before, | ||
had | had shown the discovery and isolation of insulin and the conquest, or at least control of | ||
pernicious anemia | pernicious anemia." | ||
"You don't think it's still that way, Doctor? That is, that | "You don't think it's still that way, Doctor? That is, that | ||
creative discovery is going on all right, but that everything is | creative discovery is going on all right, but that everything is | ||
bigger so the flaws in the system are more conspicuous?" | bigger so the flaws in the system are more conspicuous?" | ||
"I wish I could think so, Inspector, but the evidence | "I wish I could think so, Inspector, but the evidence | ||
seems to me pretty convincing that the same elements which | seems to me pretty convincing that the same elements which | ||
are disrupting our schools and universities, our religion, our | are disrupting our schools and universities, our religion, our | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
medicine. Of course there were flaws before, no question | medicine. Of course there were flaws before, no question | ||
about that, but they were the ordinary human flaws | about that, but they were the ordinary human flaws | ||
and, as such, were understandable, | and, as such, were understandable, even predictable. | ||
Good doctors and bad ones, wise ones and stupid ones | Good doctors and bad ones, wise ones and stupid ones | ||
those who were ambitious for the almighty | those who were ambitious for the almighty dollar and |
Latest revision as of 04:14, 4 August 2021
18
the vasopressor and a pressor for the dilator. In that way he was able to explain whatever happened. I was quite inexperienced in the world of research at that time and I was vastly impressed by this vascular microcosm conjured up by the inventor's wand. The only thing was, I couldn't decide whether I should believe it or not. Finally I asked somebody from P & S whether all of this had been confirmed in some other laboratory, to which he responded after what I took to be a certain hesitation, "He's carried it all so far that it would take someone else half a lifetime to repeat it and nobody is sufficiently interested to give the time to it." I gathered that most groups took a dim view of the whole story, although the journals published the paper, probably because they couldn't deny it any more than they could confirm it. So far as I know, the whole theory was lost sight of and to this day I don't know whether the author was an enthusiast, a prophet or an impostor. But that was a picturesque phenomenon of that period a curious exception in a history which, not so long before, had shown the discovery and isolation of insulin and the conquest, or at least control of pernicious anemia."
"You don't think it's still that way, Doctor? That is, that
creative discovery is going on all right, but that everything is bigger so the flaws in the system are more conspicuous?"
"I wish I could think so, Inspector, but the evidence
seems to me pretty convincing that the same elements which are disrupting our schools and universities, our religion, our character and standards of morality - have penetrated that most sensitive of fields, namely, the profession of medicine. Of course there were flaws before, no question about that, but they were the ordinary human flaws and, as such, were understandable, even predictable. Good doctors and bad ones, wise ones and stupid ones those who were ambitious for the almighty dollar and