.MTM3Ng.MTE3MjI5: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "2 and I hope to god I shall never be such a fool as to expect accurate treatment from a man of your generation who has been connected with publications; but i should like to...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
and I hope to god I shall never be such a fool as to expect accurate treatment from a man of your generation who has been connected with publications; but i should like to ask you what the hell you think you gain and what good you expect to do American literature or American criticism by printing such a jumble of utter inaccuracy as your "[[unclear]] of a Poetry Reader? | and I hope to god I shall never be such a fool as to expect accurate treatment from a man of your generation who has been connected with publications; but i should like to ask you what the hell you think you gain and what good you expect to do American literature or American criticism by printing such a jumble of utter inaccuracy as your "[[unclear]] of a Poetry Reader? | ||
As for statement on your p. 413 you can see by p. 57 of the Little Review for March 1918 that it is simply a common or garden lie and the authoress a plain and simple perpetrator of said mode of expression. | |||
I dont want any publicity out of you, I dont suggest that you even publish this hasty epistle: and far be it from me to indicate that any allowance is to be made for my ten years interrupted analysis of the Provencal, Greek and Anglo-Saxon metric and [[huralectic?]]. As a mere writer on politics, the idea that accurate thought should be wasted on so trifling a thing as literature may annoy you but I should like an answer, a simple or even an elaborate answer to the question, what good are you doing either either literature or your public or your magazine by this work of [[unclear]] | |||
I don't want to write for you, I don't care a curse whether you print the small amount of contemporary writing which is [[unclear]] but I would like five minutes of [[mental?]] honesty from you on the subject of literature | |||
Sincerely yours | |||
(signed) Ezra Pound |
Revision as of 17:06, 11 February 2021
2
and I hope to god I shall never be such a fool as to expect accurate treatment from a man of your generation who has been connected with publications; but i should like to ask you what the hell you think you gain and what good you expect to do American literature or American criticism by printing such a jumble of utter inaccuracy as your "unclear of a Poetry Reader?
As for statement on your p. 413 you can see by p. 57 of the Little Review for March 1918 that it is simply a common or garden lie and the authoress a plain and simple perpetrator of said mode of expression.
I dont want any publicity out of you, I dont suggest that you even publish this hasty epistle: and far be it from me to indicate that any allowance is to be made for my ten years interrupted analysis of the Provencal, Greek and Anglo-Saxon metric and huralectic?. As a mere writer on politics, the idea that accurate thought should be wasted on so trifling a thing as literature may annoy you but I should like an answer, a simple or even an elaborate answer to the question, what good are you doing either either literature or your public or your magazine by this work of unclear I don't want to write for you, I don't care a curse whether you print the small amount of contemporary writing which is unclear but I would like five minutes of mental? honesty from you on the subject of literature
Sincerely yours (signed) Ezra Pound