.MTM0OQ.MTEzMzgw: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
imported>CastleCourt
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Savannah 11th January 1818
Savannah 11th January 1818


D.B. Mitchell [[unclear]]
D.B. Mitchell Esq.


[[Sir?]]
Sir,


Altho you do not state [[naturally?]] in you letter of the 20 [[wish?]] that the Africans detained by you had been brought within the [[unclear]] limits of the state of Georgia, yet I take it for granted that you are under the [[interpretation?]] that such is the [[unclear]]. The act of [[Congress?]] to which you have[[unclear]] [[unclear]] that in all cases the negroes [[unclear]] shall be [[delivered?]] over to the state authority to be dealt with according to the [[unclear]]  of the laws of such state. Now if the negroes in question were [[unclear]] brought into this state, the effect of the act of [[Congress?]] would be in my opinion, to [[devise?]] its original? owner of any [[unclear]] or title which they may have had, and at once gave to the state a [[unclear]] to the [[unclear]] of the negroes. Until recently [[unclear]] you know, there was no act of this state in relation to property of this [[description?]] which could be [[unclear]] with effect.  That part of the [[unclear]] of the [[unclear]] state, which [[unclear]] the commander of the national [[unclear]] to [[unclear]] over the negroes to the [[unclear]] of the [[unclear]] to make [[unclear]]
Altho you do not state particularly in you letter of the 2d inst.  that the Africans detained by you had been brought within the jurisdictional limits of the State of Georgia, yet I take it for granted that you are under the impression that such is the fact. The act of Congress to which you have reference provides that in all cases [crossed out: the] Negroes Seized shall be delivered over to the State Authority to be dealt with according to the provisions of the Laws of such State. Now if the Negroes in question were first brought into this State, the effect of the act of Congress would be in my opinion, to divest the original owners of any right or title which they may have had, and at once gave to the State a right to the possession of the Negroes. Until recently as you know, there was no act of this State in relation to property of this description which could be carried into effect.  That part of the Act of the [[unclear]] States, which required the commander of the national vessels to deliver over the Negroes to the overseers of the poor& to make report

Revision as of 04:12, 30 November 2020

Savannah 11th January 1818

D.B. Mitchell Esq.

Sir,

Altho you do not state particularly in you letter of the 2d inst. that the Africans detained by you had been brought within the jurisdictional limits of the State of Georgia, yet I take it for granted that you are under the impression that such is the fact. The act of Congress to which you have reference provides that in all cases [crossed out: the] Negroes Seized shall be delivered over to the State Authority to be dealt with according to the provisions of the Laws of such State. Now if the Negroes in question were first brought into this State, the effect of the act of Congress would be in my opinion, to divest the original owners of any right or title which they may have had, and at once gave to the State a right to the possession of the Negroes. Until recently as you know, there was no act of this State in relation to property of this description which could be carried into effect. That part of the Act of the unclear States, which required the commander of the national vessels to deliver over the Negroes to the overseers of the poor& to make report