.MTA1Ng.NzExNjQ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>P1umtree (Created page with "...") |
imported>P1umtree No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
58 | 58 | ||
The Judges of the Supreme Court having submitted to the National Committee the difficulty arising from four Judges dissenting from the decision of a certain question, by the Judiciary being entirely deficient, whether a majority of Judges shall rule the decision of the fourt, or not, it is therefore the opinion of this body that the opinion of the majority of the Judges of the said Court be sufficient to decide all matter of controversy that way he bought before them except in cases of capital crimes, then, in such cases, the unanimous opinion of said Judges shall be sufficient. | The Judges of the Supreme Court having submitted to the National Committee the difficulty arising from four Judges dissenting from the decision of a certain question, by the Judiciary being entirely deficient, whether a majority of Judges shall rule the decision of the fourt, or not, it is therefore the opinion of this body that the opinion of the majority of the Judges of the said Court be sufficient to decide all matter of controversy that way he bought before them except in cases of capital crimes, then, in such cases, the unanimous opinion of said Judges shall be sufficient. | ||
Elijah | Elijah Hicks pt | ||
Major Ridge [[unclear]] | |||
New Echota} concurs Em Hicks [[unclear]] | |||
20th Oct 1827} John Ross [[unclear]] | |||
E. Boudinott | |||
[[unclear]] Council | |||
Revision as of 01:13, 25 July 2020
58
The Judges of the Supreme Court having submitted to the National Committee the difficulty arising from four Judges dissenting from the decision of a certain question, by the Judiciary being entirely deficient, whether a majority of Judges shall rule the decision of the fourt, or not, it is therefore the opinion of this body that the opinion of the majority of the Judges of the said Court be sufficient to decide all matter of controversy that way he bought before them except in cases of capital crimes, then, in such cases, the unanimous opinion of said Judges shall be sufficient.
Elijah Hicks pt
Major Ridge unclear
New Echota} concurs Em Hicks unclear 20th Oct 1827} John Ross unclear E. Boudinott
unclear Council