.MTA1Ng.NzExNTc: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>P1umtree (Created page with "...") |
imported>P1umtree No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
vs. New Town 28th Octo. 1825 | vs. New Town 28th Octo. 1825 | ||
Sarah Raincrow | Sarah Raincrow | ||
I in this | I in this case the plaintiff Jessee Bushyhead Saith he is not Satisfied with the Judgement And decision as it now stands against him because he saith he does not believe he has had Justice done according to the laws of the Nation, nor the Justice of the Case, he understands that there is a law of the Cherokee Nation to provide for orphan children my claim is for orphans but how can it be so that John Wilkeson could Sell to Sarah Rain Crow a Negro that he had no Right to, A Negro that belongs to the Hiers of Edward Wilkeson, is not this So did not the Negro in dispute belong to the Heirs of Edward Wilkeson, [[words scratched out]] if she did, how could John Wilkeson Sell her and make a Right to Sarah Rain crow If Foreman as Executor did Receive a few dollars of the price of the Negro as Executor, that could not make the | ||
right | right |
Latest revision as of 19:00, 24 July 2020
51
Capt. Sitting Down, All Bone, James Davis, Grass, Tesunovskee, & Hog Shooter, having made a claim for services during the year 1821 instead of 1820.
And it appearing to the satisfaction of the Committee that Sour John was appointed in 1821 and received pay; and that Capt. Sitting Down, All Bone, James Davis, Grass, Te,sun,ov,shee and Hog Shooter were paid in full for their services for the year 1820, and previous to that year for all services. It is therefore decided that said Capt. Sitting Down, All Bone, James Davis, Grass, Te,sun,ov,skee & Hog Shooter have no right to receive any further compensation whatever.
New Town 22d October 1825 A. McCoy Clerk of National Committee
Jessee Bushyhead
vs. New Town 28th Octo. 1825
Sarah Raincrow
I in this case the plaintiff Jessee Bushyhead Saith he is not Satisfied with the Judgement And decision as it now stands against him because he saith he does not believe he has had Justice done according to the laws of the Nation, nor the Justice of the Case, he understands that there is a law of the Cherokee Nation to provide for orphan children my claim is for orphans but how can it be so that John Wilkeson could Sell to Sarah Rain Crow a Negro that he had no Right to, A Negro that belongs to the Hiers of Edward Wilkeson, is not this So did not the Negro in dispute belong to the Heirs of Edward Wilkeson, words scratched out if she did, how could John Wilkeson Sell her and make a Right to Sarah Rain crow If Foreman as Executor did Receive a few dollars of the price of the Negro as Executor, that could not make the right