.MTA1OA.NzE0NDg: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Lcollins
(Created page with "Washington City, July 7th, 1836. Am S. Cloud Esq Sor,In a conversation with Mr Thomas of North Carolina he informed me he had talked with you and you had stated to him that Mr...")
 
imported>Lcollins
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Washington City, July 7th, 1836.
Washington City, July 7th, 1836.
Am S. Cloud Esq
Am S. Cloud Esq
Sor,In a conversation with Mr Thomas of North Carolina he informed me he had talked with you and you had stated to him that Mr John Ross's course in relation to the difficulties of your people with the government, had been shaped in great measurement the advice he had received from members of both branches of Congress, and who, when the Treaty came up to be finally acted on,
Sor,In a conversation with Mr Thomas of North Carolina he informed me he had talked with you and you had stated to him that Mr John Ross's course in relation to the difficulties of your people with the government, had been shaped in great measure by the advice he had received from members of both branches of Congress, and who, when the Treaty came up to be finally acted on, and when the appropriation was voted in the lower house, acted in bad faith either to their position or in implied pledges. Was the question is now settled, except so far as individual character is concerned, it is hoped you will have no scruples in saying how true the foregoing may be, and also whatever particular fact you may be possessed of in support of the statement made by Mr Thomas;

Revision as of 17:01, 18 May 2020

Washington City, July 7th, 1836. Am S. Cloud Esq Sor,In a conversation with Mr Thomas of North Carolina he informed me he had talked with you and you had stated to him that Mr John Ross's course in relation to the difficulties of your people with the government, had been shaped in great measure by the advice he had received from members of both branches of Congress, and who, when the Treaty came up to be finally acted on, and when the appropriation was voted in the lower house, acted in bad faith either to their position or in implied pledges. Was the question is now settled, except so far as individual character is concerned, it is hoped you will have no scruples in saying how true the foregoing may be, and also whatever particular fact you may be possessed of in support of the statement made by Mr Thomas;