.MTAzMA.Njg2NDI: Difference between revisions
imported>Skemmler No edit summary |
imported>Skemmler No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
from the state, peaceably if be can- | from the state, peaceably if be can- if not be | ||
will | will use force; that they [[have ?]] not in the state | ||
[[sufficient?]] troops to do this now, and [[unclear]] it will | [[sufficient?]] troops to do this now, and [[unclear]] it will | ||
later turn and a good deal of [[money?]] [[unclear]] | later turn and a good deal of [[money?]] [[unclear]] |
Latest revision as of 14:18, 25 May 2020
from the state, peaceably if be can- if not be will use force; that they have ? not in the state sufficient? troops to do this now, and unclear it will later turn and a good deal of money? unclear unclear additional troops. That they wish to exhaust every expedient that promises success to remove them peacefully, that in his opinion? the return of the prisoners would be effective -hence? his desire? for their return. But should it fail, he guarantys that our troops will be permitted to operate against ((these?))indians in Mexico unmolested, and moreover the state? troops would act with ours. Williams appointment as Comissioner has proved an unfortunate unclear. The indians dislike him so much that they have twice prevented his speaking? to claim in Council?, and were disposed to kill him. The delegate from the Kickapoos + Pottowatomies has been twice, to protect against Williams again going to Mexico?, He did not unclear unclear the unclear