.MTAzNA.NjkyOTM: Difference between revisions
imported>Rabbitpetter No edit summary |
imported>Rabbitpetter No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
dirty but if I was, the injury was done to Capt. French and in no way concerned the Commanding Officer of Fort Clark as there is no complaint as to the [[unknown]] of the property, whether Capt. French had been a member of the member of the council or not it would have made no difference about the library, as I should not have permitted it to be distributed and broken into. In my opinion Company A had awarded it a much larger share of the [[post?]] property than properly belonged to it if the division of property made by prior Council of which Capt French was senior member were just. | dirty but if I was, the injury was done to Capt. French and in no way concerned the Commanding Officer of Fort Clark as there is no complaint as to the [[unknown]] of the property, whether Capt. French had been a member of the member of the council or not it would have made no difference about the library, as I should not have permitted it to be distributed and broken into. In my opinion Company A had awarded it a much larger share of the [[post?]] property than properly belonged to it if the division of property made by prior Council of which Capt French was senior member were just. By referring to the proceedings [[unknown]] April 27 1871 page 89 it will be observed that those companies that were about leaving the post and that had equal claims on the Post Library that Co A had (unless the fact that Co A brought part of the books to the post while these companies brought none, gave to Co A claims superior to to theirs) got no share of the Post Library, or its value. | ||
Revision as of 02:07, 20 April 2020
dirty but if I was, the injury was done to Capt. French and in no way concerned the Commanding Officer of Fort Clark as there is no complaint as to the unknown of the property, whether Capt. French had been a member of the member of the council or not it would have made no difference about the library, as I should not have permitted it to be distributed and broken into. In my opinion Company A had awarded it a much larger share of the post? property than properly belonged to it if the division of property made by prior Council of which Capt French was senior member were just. By referring to the proceedings unknown April 27 1871 page 89 it will be observed that those companies that were about leaving the post and that had equal claims on the Post Library that Co A had (unless the fact that Co A brought part of the books to the post while these companies brought none, gave to Co A claims superior to to theirs) got no share of the Post Library, or its value.