.Nw.ODMw: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
-quence ag[ai]st Corinthus who denyed ye divinity of X. Corinthus did
-quence ag[ai]st Corinthus who denyed ye divinity of X. Corinthus did
teach 1 yt there was an unknown father [Greek].  2 yt ye world
teach 1 yt there was an unknown father [Greek].  2 yt ye world
was made by ye Den?urgus betwn am & ye father ye [greek]  
was made by ye Demiurgus betwn wm & ye father ye [greek]  
emanation. 3. yt this ☉ [Symbol: sun] was in a state of Darknes as to ye [greek]
emanation. 3. yt this ☉ [Symbol: sun] was in a state of Darknes as to ye [greek]
only some few had some beams of light from him by wch they knew him
only some few had some beams of light from him by wch they knew him

Revision as of 02:04, 21 July 2017

But still owns it & justifies himself, wch certainly he wd never have done if he had known himself to be a mere man, else he must be charged as one who being a mere man affected divine hands contrary to yt humility wch was so nual [natural] to him and Phi 2.6.7 No one can be called God overall blessed forevermore as X is called Rom 9.5. but he yt is God by nature & not only by office The Socinian sense of Jn 1.1.2.8-9 &c. is unna[tur]al for it obscure & jejune, but ye other sense is strong weighty consistt. & of great conse -quence ag[ai]st Corinthus who denyed ye divinity of X. Corinthus did teach 1 yt there was an unknown father [Greek]. 2 yt ye world was made by ye Demiurgus betwn wm & ye father ye [greek] emanation. 3. yt this ☉ [Symbol: sun] was in a state of Darknes as to ye [greek] only some few had some beams of light from him by wch they knew him 4 yt Jesus was a mere man but of great goodnes wisdom & sanctity 5 yt ye [Greek: ῶροαςχήν?] at ye baptism of Jesus dis send down a divine power upon him wch returning to ye [greek] & wn he was crucified Nothing contributes more to ye understanding [of] St Jn then this Scheme of the Corinthian herecie delivered by ye ancient Fathers To Hebr: 1.8.9 wee say yt X was Anointed or a mediator & in yt ry pt. God was his God but this proves not yt he had no divine nature in conjunction wth ye humane

Jn 1 Cor: 8.6. wee must observe ye Apt. design was to deni any division in those beings & Heathens worshpt insted of Gods & to show there was b[?] one Medial in oppoon [opposition] to their many Lords Mar: 13.32. As ye body of X was subjt. to weaknes & infirmity so mt. his humane sone be to ignoranced, neither was it necessary yt by [illeg] of ye union ye divine nature shd communicate to ye humane soul of X all divine mysteries

The creating of ye ☉ [Sun] of ye making of an argumt of Xs divinity Rom: 1.20. Jn. 1.3. Hebr. 1.10. Col: 1,16.17.&c. Neither may ye Socinary Interpret those places of ye state of things under ye gospel bre. 1 where ye new creation is spoken of in some circumstances are added to limit ye sense of it as Epla 210. 2 Cor. 5.17 2ls[?] there are some things said to be created by X wch cannot relate to ye new creaon [creation]