.OTky.NjQxNjQ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
& we are industriously employed to refer the trial of the [[Bature?]] to that Tribunal that we may establish a precedent for sending the Yazoo claimants there also. Our Supreme Judges are models of integrity & we have a majority in Congress as exemplary in this respect as the Supreme Judges. These fellows refused peremtorily to go into the [[question?]] of corruption & we are told they are the only proper Tribunal to try it. | & we are industriously employed to refer the trial of the [[Bature?]] to that Tribunal that we may establish a precedent for sending the Yazoo claimants there also. Our Supreme Judges are models of integrity & we have a majority in Congress as exemplary in this respect as the Supreme Judges. These fellows refused peremtorily to go into the [[question?]] of corruption & we are told they are the only proper Tribunal to try it. | ||
I understand [[ | I understand [[Benien?]] & [[Davis?]] are about to proceed on the judgment of [[Mcbredie?]]. If you can with propriety interpose to obtain a further [[respite?]] until we can do something with [[Morel?]] you will much oblige me. I cannot get the mony without |
Revision as of 01:35, 25 February 2020
& we are industriously employed to refer the trial of the Bature? to that Tribunal that we may establish a precedent for sending the Yazoo claimants there also. Our Supreme Judges are models of integrity & we have a majority in Congress as exemplary in this respect as the Supreme Judges. These fellows refused peremtorily to go into the question? of corruption & we are told they are the only proper Tribunal to try it. I understand Benien? & Davis? are about to proceed on the judgment of Mcbredie?. If you can with propriety interpose to obtain a further respite? until we can do something with Morel? you will much oblige me. I cannot get the mony without