.OTky.NjQxNjQ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
and we are industriously employed to refer the trial of the [[Bature?]] to that Tribunal that we may establish a precedent for sending the | and we are industriously employed to refer the trial of the [[Bature?]] to that Tribunal that we may establish a precedent for sending the Yazoo claimants there also. Our Supreme Judges are models of integrity and we have a majority in Congress as exemplary in this respect as the Supreme Judges. These fellows refused peremtorily to go into the [[question?]] of corruption and we are told they are the only [[proper?]] Tribunal to try it. | ||
I understand [[Benien?]] and [[Davis]] are about to proceed on the judgment of [[Mcbredie?]]. If you can with propriety interpose to obtain a further [[unclear]] until we can do something with [[morel]] you will much oblige me. I cannot get the mony without | I understand [[Benien?]] and [[Davis]] are about to proceed on the judgment of [[Mcbredie?]]. If you can with propriety interpose to obtain a further [[unclear]] until we can do something with [[morel]] you will much oblige me. I cannot get the mony without | ||
Revision as of 00:03, 18 February 2020
and we are industriously employed to refer the trial of the Bature? to that Tribunal that we may establish a precedent for sending the Yazoo claimants there also. Our Supreme Judges are models of integrity and we have a majority in Congress as exemplary in this respect as the Supreme Judges. These fellows refused peremtorily to go into the question? of corruption and we are told they are the only proper? Tribunal to try it. I understand Benien? and Davis are about to proceed on the judgment of Mcbredie?. If you can with propriety interpose to obtain a further unclear until we can do something with morel you will much oblige me. I cannot get the mony without