.NDI.MjIzNDg: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "by some providence discovers the fraud of the devils that so like Innocent(?) may be vindicated, or if not it is to bring them to repentance for some sin or to try their patri...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
by some providence discovers the fraud of the devils that so like Innocent(?) may be vindicated, or if not it is to bring them to repentance for some sin or to try their patrinos(?). It is hard to see such words dropping from the pen of a Jesuit(?).As for protestant writers I cannot call to mind our(?)  of anytold  that doth deny the possibility of the affirmative in the question before us.((a) printed at Frankfurt anno1689)  Dr. Henkenbaus(?)  hath lately published (a)   a learned X elaborate(?) oiscourse(?)  concerning the right method of curing such as are obsessed with caco(?)demons in which (pag105) he asserts that satan may possibly assumed the form of innocent pious reforms that so thereby he might destroy their reputations X  expose  then to undue punishments . As for our English Didnos(?) there are not many greater Casuists(?)  then mr. Perkins.Nor do I know any and that half written on the card(?)  of witchcraft with more judgement X clearways(?)  of understanding . he hath therefor(?) words (b) If a man being dangerously sick X like to dy upon suspicion will takeit upon his death that such on and(?)  hath bewitched him Hy(?)  an allegation which may move the judge to examine the party but is of no momment  for conviction ((c) in his witch craft discovers p.277) the like is asserted by our Coapre (?) Mr. Bernard once a famous minister at Batcomb in Somerset his book called a guide to grand juryman in cases of witchcraft  a solis(?) Xwise (?)  realizes  what his judgement was in the case now under debate  we may see pag. 204.210 where his words are this(?)  an apparition  of the party suspected whom the affliction in their fits seen to see is a great suspicion  yet this is but presumption this a strong and becomes this apparitions  are wrought by the Devil and can  represent  to this fancy such as those paralysis(?)  used to fear in whcih his representatoin he may as well by as in his other wchufs(?)  for if the devil can represent  wich seeming  samuel saying see Gods afiowing(?)  out earth to beguile  saul may we not think he can represent  common ordnary person  men or woman unrengerable  though no witch to the fancy  of cain performs to decieve them X other  that will give credit to the devil thus mr bernard
[underlined: by some providence discovers the fraud of the Devils that to the Innocent may be vindicated, or if not it is to bring to Repentance for some sin or to try their patience.]  It is hard to see such words dropping from the pen of a Jesuit. As for Protestant writers, I cannot call to mind one of any note that doth deny the possibility of the affirmative in the question before us. [margin note: a/ printed at Frankfurt anon 1689] Dr. [Henkelius?] hath lately published (a) learned & elaborate discourse concerning [underlined: the right method of turning such as are obsessed with {illegible} demons] in which (page 105) he asserts that [underlined: Satan may possibly assume the form of innocent & pious persons that so thereby he might destroy their reputations & {illegible} to undue punishments.]  As for our English [Didmos?] there are not many greater [Casuists?] then Mr. Perkins. Nor do I know any one that hath written on the case of witchcraft with more [illegible] general & clearness of understanding. He hath these words (b) [underlined: If a man being dangerously sick & like to dy upon suspition will take it upon his death, that such an one hath bewitched him , why an allegation with may move the Judge to examine the party, but is of no moment for conviction.] The like [illegible] by Mr. Cooper (c) Mr. Bernard 9one a famous minister at Batcomb in Somerset his book called [underline: A Guide to Grand Jury men in cases of witchcraft], [illegibile]

Revision as of 02:23, 1 July 2017

[underlined: by some providence discovers the fraud of the Devils that to the Innocent may be vindicated, or if not it is to bring to Repentance for some sin or to try their patience.] It is hard to see such words dropping from the pen of a Jesuit. As for Protestant writers, I cannot call to mind one of any note that doth deny the possibility of the affirmative in the question before us. [margin note: a/ printed at Frankfurt anon 1689] Dr. [Henkelius?] hath lately published (a) learned & elaborate discourse concerning [underlined: the right method of turning such as are obsessed with {illegible} demons] in which (page 105) he asserts that [underlined: Satan may possibly assume the form of innocent & pious persons that so thereby he might destroy their reputations & {illegible} to undue punishments.] As for our English [Didmos?] there are not many greater [Casuists?] then Mr. Perkins. Nor do I know any one that hath written on the case of witchcraft with more [illegible] general & clearness of understanding. He hath these words (b) [underlined: If a man being dangerously sick & like to dy upon suspition will take it upon his death, that such an one hath bewitched him , why an allegation with may move the Judge to examine the party, but is of no moment for conviction.] The like [illegible] by Mr. Cooper (c) Mr. Bernard 9one a famous minister at Batcomb in Somerset his book called [underline: A Guide to Grand Jury men in cases of witchcraft], [illegibile]

Retrieved from "https://digital.newberry.org/transcribe/wiki/index.php?title=.NDI.MjIzNDg&oldid=4647"