.MTA2NA.NzIzMjU: Difference between revisions
imported>Hearthemelody No edit summary |
imported>Hearthemelody No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
"An examination of the Cherokee question", which seems intended | "An examination of the Cherokee question", which seems intended | ||
as a review of the late decision of the Supreme Court of the | as a review of the late decision of the Supreme Court of the | ||
United States in the missionary | United States in the missionary cause. The Editor invites the | ||
attention of the country to this article by the assurance that "it | |||
is from the pen of one eminently qualified, by his intimacy | |||
with all that concerns in Indian relations, and by his legal | |||
and literary attainments, to do justice to the subject." Common | |||
rumor has, without contradiction, attributed the article to a | |||
member of the present cabinet, and to that member who [[staud?]] | |||
Revision as of 20:48, 16 December 2019
etc. ayne. John Howard. Autograph manuscript relating to entitled "Publications Justifying the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Missionary Case" (Cherokee Indians). 33 pp 4to. back of this ?
justifying the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Missionary Case."
In the official paper published at Washington, the Globe, of Saturday, March 31. 1832, there is an essay of twelve columns headed "An examination of the Cherokee question", which seems intended as a review of the late decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the missionary cause. The Editor invites the attention of the country to this article by the assurance that "it is from the pen of one eminently qualified, by his intimacy with all that concerns in Indian relations, and by his legal and literary attainments, to do justice to the subject." Common rumor has, without contradiction, attributed the article to a member of the present cabinet, and to that member who staud?