.NDI.MjIzMjI: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
(New hand) | (New hand) | ||
The first [underlined | The first Case [underlined] which I am desired to express | ||
my judgmen^t in, is this, [underlined: Whether it is not | my judgmen^t in, is this, [underlined: Whether it is not | ||
possible for the Divel to impose on the im | possible for the Divel to impose on the im |
Revision as of 13:21, 17 July 2017
(New hand) The first Case [underlined] which I am desired to express my judgmen^t in, is this, [underlined: Whether it is not possible for the Divel to impose on the im [crossed out: m]aginations of persons bewitched and to cause them to beleive if ^t an Inocent, yea that a pious person does torment them = when y^e Div^l himself doth it, or whether Satan may not appear in the shape of a pious & Inocent as well as in the shape of a nocent & wicked person to afflict such as suffer - by Diabolical molestations?] The [underlined: Answer] to the Question must be [underlined: Affirma tive]. Let the following Arguments bee duely= weighed in the Ballance of the Sanctuary. Argum. 1. Ther are Severall Scriptures from which wee may infer the possibility of what is affirmed. 1. Wee find [underlined: that the Divel by the instigation of the witch at Endor ap= =peard in the Likeness of the Prophet Samuel]. I am not Ignorant that some have offered that which if it were proved would evert this ar= gum^t viz: that it was the true and not [crossed out word] a de= lusive Samuel which the witch brought to converse with Saul. Of this Opinion are