.NDI.MjIzMjA: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "The contents The first case considered whether satan may not possibly appear in the shape of an innocent and pious, as well as of a nocent and wicked person, to afflict such...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The first case considered whether satan may not possibly appear in the shape of an innocent and pious, as well as of a nocent and wicked person, to afflict such as suffer by Diabolical [molestations?]. The Affirmative [proved?] by six arguments. Arg 1. From [crossed out word] Several Scriptures. p.1. to 11. Arg.2. Because it is possible for the devill in the shape of an inocent-person to do other mischiefs. proved by many instances. p.11 to 15. | The first case considered whether satan may not possibly appear in the shape of an innocent and pious, as well as of a nocent and wicked person, to afflict such as suffer by Diabolical [molestations?]. The Affirmative [proved?] by six arguments. Arg 1. From [crossed out word] Several Scriptures. p.1. to 11. Arg.2. Because it is possible for the devill in the shape of an inocent-person to do other mischiefs. proved by many instances. p.11 to 15. | ||
Arg.3. Because if Satan may not Represent an inocent person as afflicting others, it must be Either [because?] hee wants will, or Power to do thus, or because the holy God will never Permit him to | Arg.3. Because if Satan may not Represent an inocent person as afflicting others, it must be Either [because?] hee wants will, or Power to do thus, or because the holy God will never Permit him to do it . None of [wch?] may be affirmed. p.15. to 22. | ||
Arg.4. It is certayn both from Scripture [2 crossed out words] History that magicians by their inchantments, & [hellishe?] conjurations, may cause a false [Representation?] of persons & things. p. 22 to 26. | Arg.4. It is certayn both from Scripture [2 crossed out words] History that magicians by their inchantments, & [hellishe?] conjurations, may cause a false [Representation?] of persons & things. p. 22 to 26. | ||
Arg.5. From the concurring judgement of many [learned?] [&?] judicious men. p.26 to 29. | Arg.5. From the concurring judgement of many [learned?] [&?] judicious men. p.26 to 29. | ||
Arg 6.6 [or?] owne experience has confirmed [ye] truth of what wee affirm. 29. |
Revision as of 20:04, 29 June 2017
The contents
The first case considered whether satan may not possibly appear in the shape of an innocent and pious, as well as of a nocent and wicked person, to afflict such as suffer by Diabolical [molestations?]. The Affirmative [proved?] by six arguments. Arg 1. From [crossed out word] Several Scriptures. p.1. to 11. Arg.2. Because it is possible for the devill in the shape of an inocent-person to do other mischiefs. proved by many instances. p.11 to 15. Arg.3. Because if Satan may not Represent an inocent person as afflicting others, it must be Either [because?] hee wants will, or Power to do thus, or because the holy God will never Permit him to do it . None of [wch?] may be affirmed. p.15. to 22. Arg.4. It is certayn both from Scripture [2 crossed out words] History that magicians by their inchantments, & [hellishe?] conjurations, may cause a false [Representation?] of persons & things. p. 22 to 26. Arg.5. From the concurring judgement of many [learned?] [&?] judicious men. p.26 to 29. Arg 6.6 [or?] owne experience has confirmed [ye] truth of what wee affirm. 29.